Perturbing to Preserve: Defending Fragile Knowledge in Online Continual Learning
Dulan Zhou, Zijian Gao, Kele Xu
Abstract
Online continual learning mandates the ability to acquire knowledge from non-stationary data streams while preserving previously learned information, yet neural networks often forget. In this work, we uncover and systematically analyze a critical yet underexplored issue in this setting, which we term knowledge fragility: the phenomenon where correctly learned instances are abruptly forgotten following minor parameter updates. We attribute this phenomenon to two factors: (1) temporally, where high-frequency oscillations in parameter space lead to disproportionate forgetting relative to adaptation, and (2) spatially, where fragile instances reside in sharp, high-curvature regions of the loss landscape, making them highly susceptible to optimization noise. To counteract this fragility, we propose PDFK (Perturbing to Defend Fragile Knowledge)-a unified and task-agnostic framework that fortifies fragile knowledge along both temporal and spatial dimensions. Temporally, PDFK stabilizes longterm memory by employing exponential moving average (EMA) to suppress volatile parameter shifts. Spatially, it introduces lightweight, structured perturbations guided by consistency regularization, effectively flattening the local loss surface and enhancing robustness to future updates. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that PDFK consistently improves knowledge retention and surpasses state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and forgetting metrics under challenging streaming settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Decouple Your Discovery and Memory in Continual Generalized Category DiscoveryJiawei Yu, Zijian Gao, Xingxing Zhang, Xuan Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- Re-evaluating Continual VQA: Toward Fair and Robust Evaluation for Multimodal Continual LearningZijian Gao, Zicheng Sun, Xingxing Zhang, Kele Xu et al.CVPR 2026
- Geometry-driven OOD Detectors Are Class-Incremental LearnersWangwang Jia, Zijian Gao, Tianjiao Wan, Yuan Cao et al.CVPR 2026
Builds on16
- Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple BaselinePietro Buzzega, Matteo Boschini, Angelo Porrello, Davide Abati et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,494 citations
- New Insights on Reducing Abrupt Representation Change in Online Continual LearningLucas Caccia, Rahaf Aljundi, Nader Asadi, Tinne Tuytelaars et al.ICLR 2022 · 279 citations
- Online Class-Incremental Continual Learning with Adversarial Shapley ValueDongsub Shim, Zheda Mai, Jihwan Jeong, Scott Sanner et al.AAAI 2021 · 262 citations
- Class-Incremental Learning via Dual AugmentationFei Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Xu-Yao Zhang, Cheng-Lin LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 256 citations
- Online Prototype Learning for Online Continual LearningYujie Wei, Jiaxin Ye, Zhizhong Huang, Junping Zhang et al.ICCV 2023 · 78 citations
Related papers
- Mitigating Forgetting in Online Continual Learning via Instance-Aware ParameterizationHung-Jen Chen, An-Chieh Cheng, Da-Cheng Juan, Wei Wei et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 50 citations
- Layerwise Proximal Replay: A Proximal Point Method for Online Continual LearningJinsoo Yoo, Yunpeng Liu, Frank Wood, Geoff PleissICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Beyond Sharpness: A Flatness Decomposition Framework for Efficient Continual LearningYanan Chen, Tieliang Gong, Yunjiao Zhang, Wen WenAAAI 2026
- Data Augmented Flatness-aware Gradient Projection for Continual LearningEnneng Yang, Li Shen, Zhenyi Wang, Shiwei Liu et al.ICCV 2023 · 28 citations
- Using Hindsight to Anchor Past Knowledge in Continual LearningArslan Chaudhry, Albert Gordo, Puneet K. Dokania, Philip H. S. Torr et al.AAAI 2021 · 279 citations
