Fourier Spectrum of Noisy Quantum Algorithms
Uma Girish
Abstract
Quantum computing promises exponential speedups for certain problems, yet fully universal quantum computers remain out of reach and near-term devices are inherently noisy. Motivated by this, we study noisy quantum algorithms and the landscape between BQP and BPP. We build on a powerful technique to differentiate quantum and classical algorithms called the levelℓ Fourier growth (the sum of absolute values of Fourier coefficients of sets of size ℓ) and show that it can also be used to differentiate quantum algorithms based on the types of resources used. We show that noise acting on a quantum algorithm dampens its Fourier growth in ways intricately linked to the type of noise.
Concretely, we study noisy models of quantum computation where highly mixed states are prevalent, namely: DQC k algorithms, where k qubits are clean and the rest are maximally mixed, and 1 2 BQP algorithms, where the initial state is maximally mixed, but the algorithm is given knowledge of the initial state at the end of the computation. We establish upper bounds on the Fourier growth of DQC k , 1 2 BQP and BQP algorithms and leverage the differences between these bounds to derive oracle separations between these models. In particular, we show that 2-Forrelation and 3-Forrelation require N Ω(1) queries in the DQC 1 and 1 2 BQP models respectively. Our results are proved using a new matrix decomposition lemma that might be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b1687670-388a-4e70-a578-9699770af6daBuilds on4
- Towards Optimal Separations between Quantum and Randomized Query ComplexitiesAvishay TalFOCS 2020 · 17 citations
- An optimal separation of randomized and Quantum query complexityAlexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. Storozhenko, Pei WuSTOC 2021 · 10 citations
- k-forrelation optimally separates Quantum and classical query complexityNikhil Bansal, Makrand SinhaSTOC 2021 · 7 citations
- The Power of Adaptivity in Quantum Query AlgorithmsUma Girish, Makrand Sinha, Avishay Tal, Kewen WuSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
Related papers
- On the need for large quantum depthNai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Ching-Yi LaiSTOC 2020 · 23 citations
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 18 citations
- Purest Quantum State IdentificationYingqi Yu, Honglin Chen, Jun Wu, Wei Xie et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Separating QMA from QCMA with a Classical OracleJohn Bostanci, Jonas Haferkamp, Chinmay Nirkhe, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2026 · 10 citations
- Robustness of Quantum Algorithms for Nonconvex OptimizationWeiyuan Gong, Chenyi Zhang, Tongyang LiICLR 2025
