Misbehavior and Account Suspension in an Online Financial Communication Platform
Taro Tsuchiya, Alejandro Cuevas Villalba, Thomas Magelinski, Nicolas Christin
Abstract
The expanding accessibility and appeal of investing have attracted millions of new retail investors. As such, investment discussion boards became the de facto communities where traders create, disseminate, and discuss investing ideas. These communities, which can provide useful information to support investors, have anecdotally also attracted a wide range of misbehavior -toxicity, spam/fraud, and reputation manipulation. This paper is the first comprehensive analysis of online misbehavior in the context of investment communities. We study TradingView, the largest online communication platform for financial trading. We collect 2.76M user profiles with their corresponding social graphs, 4.2M historical article posts, and 5.3M comments, including information on nearly 4 000 suspended accounts and 17 000 removed comments. Price fluctuations seem to drive abuse across the platform and certain types of assets, such as "meme" stocks, attract disproportionate misbehavior. Suspended user accounts tend to form more closely-knit communities than those formed by non-suspended accounts; and paying accounts are less likely to be suspended than free accounts even when posting similar levels of content violating platform policies. We conclude by offering guidelines on how to adapt content moderation efforts to fit the particularities of online investment communities. CCS CONCEPTS • General and reference → Measurement; • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b139150d-ba79-41a8-8b79-0760ba1f7a52Cited by top-tier papers3
- Identifying Risky Vendors in Cryptocurrency P2P MarketplacesTaro Tsuchiya, Alejandro Cuevas Villalba, Nicolas ChristinWWW 2024 · 9 citations
- Meme Coin Factories: Uncovering Large-Scale Manipulations on pump.funNicolas Szwajcok, Taro Tsuchiya, Enze Liu, Kyle Soska et al.CCS 2026
- Blockchain Address PoisoningTaro Tsuchiya, Jin-Dong Dong, Kyle Soska, Nicolas ChristinUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on5
- Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data SelectionKai-Cheng Yang, Onur Varol, Pik-Mai Hui, Filippo MenczerAAAI 2020 · 385 citations
- SoK: Hate, Harassment, and the Changing Landscape of Online AbuseKurt Thomas, Devdatta Akhawe, Michael D. Bailey, Dan Boneh et al.S&P 2021 · 175 citations
- The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump SchemeJiahua Xu, Benjamin LivshitsUSENIX Security 2019 · 146 citations
- ProsocialDialog: A Prosocial Backbone for Conversational AgentsHyunwoo Kim, Youngjae Yu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu et al.EMNLP 2022 · 46 citations
- Towards Understanding Cryptocurrency Derivatives: A Case Study of BitMEXKyle Soska, Jin-Dong Dong, Alex Khodaverdian, Ariel Zetlin-Jones et al.WWW 2021 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Understanding the Behaviors of Toxic Accounts on RedditDeepak Kumar, Jeff T. Hancock, Kurt Thomas, Zakir DurumericWWW 2023 · 31 citations
- Trading as Gambling: Social Investing and Financial Risks on the r/WallStreetBets SubredditYubo Kou, Sam Moradzadeh, Xinning GuiCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/IncelsManoel Horta Ribeiro, Shagun Jhaver, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn et al.CSCW 2021 · 102 citations
- 'Is this a scam?': The Nature and Quality of Reddit Discussion about ScamsElijah Robert Bouma-Sims, Mandy Lanyon, Lorrie Faith CranorCCS 2025
- Behind the Tube: Exploitative Monetization of Content on YouTubeAndrew Chu, Arjun Arunasalam, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Z. Berkay CelikUSENIX Security 2022
