Multiplicative Logit Adjustment Approximates Neural-Collapse-Aware Decision Boundary Adjustment
Naoya Hasegawa, Issei Sato
Abstract
Real-world data distributions are often highly skewed. This has spurred a growing body of research on long-tailed recognition, aimed at addressing the imbalance in training classification models. Among the methods studied, multiplicative logit adjustment (MLA) stands out as a simple and effective method. What theoretical foundation explains the effectiveness of this heuristic method? We provide a justification for the effectiveness of MLA with the following two-step process. First, we develop a theory that adjusts optimal decision boundaries by estimating feature spread on the basis of neural collapse. Second, we demonstrate that MLA approximates this optimal method. Additionally, through experiments on long-tailed datasets, we illustrate the practical usefulness of MLA under more realistic conditions. We also offer experimental insights to guide the tuning of MLA hyperparameters.
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025
• We derive a theoretical framework for adjusting decision boundaries optimally by using feature spread estimates from neural collapse (NC) (Papyan et al., 2020) (Section 4.2).
• We demonstrate that MLA is effective for LTR by proving it has similar decision boundaries to the method based on the aforementioned theory (Section 4.3). This clarifies under what conditions this approximation holds and how adjustments should be made.
• We experimentally validate that the approximation of MLA holds under realistic, non-ideal conditions where NC is not fully realized (Section 5).
• We provide empirical guidelines for hyperparameter-tuning of MLA (Section 5.4).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on25
- Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed RecognitionBingyi Kang, Saining Xie, Marcus Rohrbach, Zhicheng Yan et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,496 citations
- Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentAditya Krishna Menon, Sadeep Jayasumana, Ankit Singh Rawat, Himanshu Jain et al.ICLR 2021 · 937 citations
- Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal EffectKaihua Tang, Jianqiang Huang, Hanwang ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 533 citations
- Exploring Balanced Feature Spaces for Representation LearningBingyi Kang, Yu Li, Sa Xie, Zehuan Yuan et al.ICLR 2021 · 296 citations
- Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular DatasetsArlind Kadra, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter, Josif GrabockaNeurIPS 2021 · 288 citations
Related papers
- Long-Tailed Recognition by Mutual Information Maximization between Latent Features and Ground-Truth LabelsMin-Kook Suh, Seung-Woo SeoICML 2023 · 30 citations
- Exploring Weight Balancing on Long-Tailed Recognition ProblemNaoya Hasegawa, Issei SatoICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Adaptive Logit Adjustment Loss for Long-Tailed Visual RecognitionYan Zhao, Weicong Chen, Xu Tan, Kai Huang et al.AAAI 2022 · 83 citations
- Local and Global Logit Adjustments for Long-Tailed LearningYingfan Tao, Jingna Sun, Hao Yang, Li Chen et al.ICCV 2023 · 32 citations
- Unlocker: Disentangle the Deadlock of Learning between Label-noisy and Long-tailed DataChen Shu, Hongjun Xu, Ruichi Zhang, Mengke Li et al.NeurIPS 2025
