When would Vision-Proprioception Policies Fail in Robotic Manipulation?
Jingxian Lu, Wenke Xia, Yuxuan Wu, Zhiwu Lu, Di Hu
Abstract
Proprioceptive information is critical for precise servo control by providing real-time robotic states. Its collaboration with vision is highly expected to enhance performances of the manipulation policy in complex tasks. However, recent studies have reported inconsistent observations on the generalization of vision-proprioception policies. In this work, we investigate this by conducting temporally controlled experiments. We found that during task sub-phases that robot's motion transitions, which require target localization, the vision modality of the vision-proprioception policy plays a limited role. Further analysis reveals that the policy naturally gravitates toward concise proprioceptive signals that offer faster loss reduction when training, thereby dominating the optimization and suppressing the learning of the visual modality during motion-transition phases. To alleviate this, we propose the Gradient Adjustment with Phase-guidance (GAP) algorithm that adaptively modulates the optimization of proprioception, enabling dynamic collaboration within the vision-proprioception policy. Specifically, we leverage proprioception to capture robotic states and estimate the probability of each timestep in the trajectory belonging to motion-transition phases. During policy learning, we apply fine-grained adjustment that reduces the magnitude of proprioception's gradient based on estimated probabilities, leading to robust and generalizable vision-proprioception policies. The comprehensive experiments demonstrate GAP is applicable in both simulated and real-world environments, across one-arm and dual-arm setups, and compatible with both conventional and Vision-Language-Action models. We believe this work can offer valuable insights into the development of vision-proprioception policies in robotic manipulation. Videos and code are available at https://gewu-lab.github.io/GAP/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Scaling Proprioceptive-Visual Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained TransformersLirui Wang, Xinlei Chen, Jialiang Zhao, Kaiming HeNeurIPS 2024 · 208 citations
- Modality Competition: What Makes Joint Training of Multi-modal Network Fail in Deep Learning? (Provably)Yu Huang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, Hongxia Yang et al.ICML 2022 · 168 citations
- Emma-X: An Embodied Multimodal Action Model with Grounded Chain of Thought and Look-ahead Spatial ReasoningQi Sun, Pengfei Hong, Pala Tej Deep, Vernon Toh et al.ACL 2025 · 35 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Predictive ControlZhiwei Jia, Vineet Thumuluri, Fangchen Liu, Linghao Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 24 citations
- Robots Pre-train Robots: Manipulation-Centric Robotic Representation from Large-Scale Robot DatasetsGuangqi Jiang, Yifei Sun, Tao Huang, Huanyu Li et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- Move-Then-Operate: Behavioral Phasing for Human-Like Robotic ManipulationHaoming Xu, Lei Lei, Jie Gu, Chu Tang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- AT-VLA: Adaptive Tactile Injection for Enhanced Feedback Reaction in Vision-Language-Action ModelsXiaoqi Li, Muhe Cai, Jiadong Xu, Juan Zhu et al.CVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- Coupling Vision and Proprioception for Navigation of Legged RobotsZipeng Fu, Ashish Kumar, Ananye Agarwal, Haozhi Qi et al.CVPR 2022 · 36 citations
- HAMSTER: Hierarchical Action Models for Open-World Robot ManipulationYi Li, Yuquan Deng, Jesse Zhang, Joel Jang et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Unifying Perception and Action: A Hybrid-Modality Pipeline with Implicit Visual Chain-of-Thought for Robotic Action GenerationXiangkai Ma, Lekai Xing, Han Zhang, Wenzhong Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 11 citations
