Co-designing Community-based Sharing of Smarthome Devices for the Purpose of Co-monitoring In-home Emergencies
Leena Alghamdi, Mamtaj Akter, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heather Lipford
Abstract
We conducted 26 co-design interviews with 50 smarthome device owners to understand the perceived benefits, drawbacks, and design considerations for developing a smarthome system that facilitates co-monitoring with emergency contacts who live outside of one’s home. Participants felt that such a system would help ensure their personal safety, safeguard from material loss, and give them peace of mind by ensuring quick response and verifying potential threats. However, they also expressed concerns regarding privacy, overburdening others, and other potential threats, such as unauthorized access and security breaches. To alleviate these concerns, participants designed flexible and granular access control and fail-safe back-up features. Our study reveals why peer-based co-monitoring of smarthomes for emergencies may be beneficial but also difficult to implement. Based on the insights gained from our study, we provide recommendations for designing technologies that facilitate such co-monitoring while mitigating its risks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0514f42-2216-4c17-aed5-e10382d2391eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Rethinking Access Control and Authentication for the Home Internet of Things (IoT)Weijia He, Maximilian Golla, Roshni Padhi, Jordan Ofek et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 221 citations
- Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User StudyEric Zeng, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2019 · 190 citations
- Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for AllJanet X. Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng et al.CHI 2022 · 163 citations
- SoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User ResearchNoel Warford, Tara Matthews, Kaitlyn Yang, Omer Akgul et al.S&P 2022 · 101 citations
- Privacy Research with Marginalized Groups: What We Know, What's Needed, and What's NextShruti Sannon, Andrea ForteCSCW 2022 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access ControlMadiha Tabassum, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heather Richter LipfordCHI 2020 · 45 citations
- Amazon vs. My Brother: How Users of Shared Smart Speakers Perceive and Cope with Privacy RisksYue Huang, Borke Obada-Obieh, Konstantin BeznosovCHI 2020 · 92 citations
- "It's the Company, the Government, You and I": User Perceptions of Responsibility for Smart Home Privacy and SecurityJulie M. Haney, Yasemin Acar, Susanne FurmanUSENIX Security 2021 · 49 citations
- "Watch My Health, Not My Data": Understanding Perceptions, Barriers, Emotional Impact, & Coping Strategies Pertaining to IoT Privacy and Security in Health Monitoring for Older AdultsSuleiman Saka, Sanchari DasCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Enabling Collaborative Anomaly Exploration in Smart Homes: Eliciting User Requirements and Security ScenariosAzhar Alsufyani, Omer F. Rana, Charith PereraUbiComp 2025 · 4 citations
