Enhancing Transformers for Generalizable First-Order Logical Entailment
Tianshi Zheng, Jiazheng Wang, Zihao Wang, Jiaxin Bai, Hang Yin, Zheye Deng, Yangqiu Song, Jianxin Li
Abstract
Transformers, as the fundamental deep learning architecture, have demonstrated great capability in reasoning. This paper studies the generalizable first-order logical reasoning ability of transformers with their parameterized knowledge and how to improve it. Transformers'capability of first-order reasoning is further captured by whether they can conduct first-order logical entailment, which is quantitatively measured by their performance in answering knowledge graph queries. We establish the connections between (1) two types of distribution shifts studied in out-of-distribution generalization and (2) unseen knowledge and query settings discussed in the task of knowledge graph query answering, which makes it possible to characterize the fine-grained generalizability. Results on our comprehensive dataset showed that transformers outperform previous methods designed particularly for this task and provided detailed empirical evidence about the impact of the input query syntax, token embedding, and transformer architectures on their reasoning capability. Interestingly, our results revealed the mismatch of positional encoding and other design choices of transformer architectures in previous practices. Motivated by this, we propose TEGA, a logic-aware architecture that significantly improves the performance in generalizable first-order logical entailment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b04db5b0-04c0-4976-be98-ee712e4c7d4aCited by top-tier papers3
- Unifying Deductive and Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs with Masked Diffusion ModelYisen Gao, Jiaxin Bai, Yi Huang, Xingcheng Fu et al.WWW 2026 · 3 citations
- LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Inductive, Abductive and Deductive Logical Inferences in LLM ReasoningTianshi Zheng, Cheng Jiayang, Chunyang Li, Haochen Shi et al.EMNLP 2025
- Neural Scalable Symbolic Search Framework for Complex Logical Queries with Multiple Free VariablesWeizhi Fei, Hang Yin, Zihao Wang, Shukai Zhao et al.KDD 2026
Builds on23
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- Abductive Commonsense ReasoningChandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Chaitanya Malaviya, Keisuke Sakaguchi et al.ICLR 2020 · 521 citations
- Deep Learning For Symbolic MathematicsGuillaume Lample, François ChartonICLR 2020 · 477 citations
- Query2box: Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in Vector Space Using Box EmbeddingsHongyu Ren, Weihua Hu, Jure LeskovecICLR 2020 · 355 citations
- Beta Embeddings for Multi-Hop Logical Reasoning in Knowledge GraphsHongyu Ren, Jure LeskovecNeurIPS 2020 · 267 citations
Related papers
- Mask and Reason: Pre-Training Knowledge Graph Transformers for Complex Logical QueriesXiao Liu, Shiyu Zhao, Kai Su, Yukuo Cen et al.KDD 2022 · 38 citations
- A Foundation Model for Zero-shot Logical Query ReasoningMichael Galkin, Jincheng Zhou, Bruno Ribeiro, Jian Tang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?Enric Boix-Adserà, Omid Saremi, Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- A Holistic Approach for Answering Logical Queries on Knowledge GraphsYuhan Wu, Yuanyuan Xu, Xuemin Lin, Wenjie ZhangICDE 2023 · 6 citations
- LinE: Logical Query Reasoning over Hierarchical Knowledge GraphsZijian Huang, Meng-Fen Chiang, Wang-Chien LeeKDD 2022 · 17 citations
