SEER: Facilitating Structured Reasoning and Explanation via Reinforcement Learning
Guoxin Chen, Kexin Tang, Chao Yang, Fuying Ye, Yu Qiao, Yiming Qian
Abstract
Elucidating the reasoning process with structured explanations from question to answer is crucial, as it significantly enhances the interpretability, traceability, and trustworthiness of question-answering (QA) systems. However, structured explanations demand models to perform intricately structured reasoning, which poses great challenges. Most existing methods focus on single-step reasoning through supervised learning, ignoring logical dependencies between steps. Moreover, existing reinforcement learning (RL) based methods overlook the structured relationships, underutilizing the potential of RL in structured reasoning. In this paper, we propose SEER, a novel method that maximizes a structure-based return to facilitate structured reasoning and explanation. Our proposed structure-based return precisely describes the hierarchical and branching structure inherent in structured reasoning, effectively capturing the intricate relationships between different reasoning steps. In addition, we introduce a fine-grained reward function to meticulously delineate diverse reasoning steps. Extensive experiments show that SEER significantly outperforms state-of-theart methods, achieving an absolute improvement of 6.9% over RL-based methods on En-tailmentBank, a 4.4% average improvement on STREET benchmark, and exhibiting outstanding efficiency and cross-dataset generalization performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/Chen-GX/SEER .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b03bc06c-a7c0-4af4-a935-830edabf6ea6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement LearningHung Le, Yue Wang, Akhilesh Deepak Gotmare, Silvio Savarese et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 571 citations
- DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding SharingPengcheng He, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2023 · 394 citations
- QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence CompositionTushar Khot, Peter Clark, Michal Guerquin, Peter Jansen et al.AAAI 2020 · 387 citations
- AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without ProcessGuoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, Kai FanNeurIPS 2024 · 219 citations
Related papers
- RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment TreesTengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 8 citations
- Structured Reasoning for LLMs: A Unified Framework for Efficiency and ExplainabilityYubo Dong, Hehe Fan, Linchao Zhu, Yi YangICLR 2026
- StepSearch: Igniting LLMs Search Ability via Step-Wise Proximal Policy OptimizationXuhui Zheng, Kang An, Ziliang Wang, Yuhang Wang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 41 citations
- ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement LearningMingyang Chen, Linzhuang Sun, Tianpeng Li, Haoze Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 125 citations
- ReasonRank: Empowering Passage Ranking with Strong Reasoning AbilityWenhan Liu, Xinyu Ma, Weiwei Sun, Yutao Zhu et al.ACL 2026 · 43 citations
