Unsupervised Legal Evidence Retrieval via Contrastive Learning with Approximate Aggregated Positive
Feng Yao, Jingyuan Zhang, Yating Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu, Changlong Sun, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen
Abstract
Verifying the facts alleged by the prosecutors before the trial requires the judges to retrieve evidence within the massive materials accompanied. Existing Legal AI applications often assume the facts are already determined and fail to notice the difficulty of reconstructing them. To build a practical Legal AI application and free the judges from the manually searching work, we introduce the task of Legal Evidence Retrieval, which aims at automatically retrieving the precise fact-related verbal evidence within a single case. We formulate the task in a dense retrieval paradigm, and jointly learn the constrastive representations and alignments between facts and evidence. To get rid of the tedious annotations, we construct an approximated positive vector for a given fact by aggregating a set of evidence from the same case. An entropy-based denoise technique is further applied to mitigate the impact of false positive samples. We train our models on tens of thousands of unlabeled cases and evaluate them on a labeled dataset containing 919 cases and 4,336 queries. Experimental results indicate that our approach is effective and outperforms other state-of-the-art representation and retrieval models. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/yaof20/LER.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0293fbd-7f92-441d-87f1-ce4217131368Builds on5
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
- Multi-View Document Representation Learning for Open-Domain Dense RetrievalShunyu Zhang, Yaobo Liang, Ming Gong, Daxin Jiang et al.ACL 2022 · 80 citations
- Incorporating Retrieval Information into the Truncation of Ranking Lists for Better Legal SearchYixiao Ma, Qingyao Ai, Yueyue Wu, Yunqiu Shao et al.SIGIR 2022 · 20 citations
- Condenser: a Pre-training Architecture for Dense RetrievalLuyu Gao, Jamie CallanEMNLP 2021
Related papers
- Enhancing Legal Case Retrieval via Scaling High-quality Synthetic Query-Candidate PairsCheng Gao, Chaojun Xiao, Zhenghao Liu, Huimin Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- DELTA: Pre-Train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word AlignmentHaitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Xinyan Han, Jia Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Legal Case Retrieval: A Survey of the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2024 · 15 citations
- Explainable Legal Case Matching via Inverse Optimal Transport-based Rationale ExtractionWeijie Yu, Zhongxiang Sun, Jun Xu, Zhenhua Dong et al.SIGIR 2022 · 45 citations
- CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case RetrievalKun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian et al.KDD 2023 · 9 citations
