Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning
Luckeciano Carvalho Melo, Alessandro Abate, Yarin Gal
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning, particularly through policy gradient methods, has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. However, the optimization stability of policy gradients in this setting remains understudied. As a result, existing implementations often resort to conservative hyperparameter choices to ensure stability, which requires more training samples and increases computational costs. Hence, developing models for reliably tracking the underlying optimization dynamics and leveraging them into training enables more sample-efficient regimes and further unleashes scalable post-training. We address this gap by formalizing the stochastic optimization problem of policy gradients with explicit consideration of second-order geometry. We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates. We further employ this framework to design interventions in the optimization process through data selection. The resultant algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out. Theoretically, we establish monotonic improvement guarantees under realistic assumptions. On standard math reasoning benchmarks, we empirically show that CAPO ensures stable updates under aggressive learning regimes where baselines catastrophically fail. With minimal intervention (rejecting fewer than 8% of tokens), CAPO achieves up to 30 improvement in sample efficiency over standard GRPO for LLM reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext afad2ed3-e1c9-4632-ad4b-68150949ae12Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement LearningGhada Sokar, Rishabh Agarwal, Pablo Samuel Castro, Utku EvciICML 2023 · 153 citations
Related papers
- Slow-Fast Policy Optimization: Reposition-Before-Update for LLM ReasoningZiyan Wang, Zheng Wang, Xingwei Qu, Qi Cheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning TasksChangpeng Yang, Jinyang Wu, Yuchen Liu, Shuai Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- CurES: From Gradient Analysis to Efficient Curriculum Learning for Reasoning LLMsYongcheng Zeng, Zexu Sun, Bokai Ji, Erxue Min et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Geometric-Mean Policy OptimizationYuzhong Zhao, Yue Liu, Junpeng Liu, Jingye Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 104 citations
- CE-GPPO: Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimization in Reinforcement LearningZhenpeng Su, Leiyu Pan, Minxuan Lv, Yuntao Li et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
