Don't Let It Fade: Preserving Edits in Diffusion Language Models via Token Timestep Allocation
Woojin Kim, Jaeyoung Do
Abstract
While diffusion language models (DLMs) enable fine-grained refinement, their practical controllability remains fragile. We identify and formally characterize a central failure mode called update forgetting, in which uniform and context agnostic updates induce token level fluctuations across timesteps, erasing earlier semantic edits and disrupting the cumulative refinement process, thereby degrading fluency and coherence. As this failure originates in uniform and context agnostic updates, effective control demands explicit token ordering. We propose Token Timestep Allocation (TTA), which realizes soft and semantic token ordering via per token timestep schedules: critical tokens are frozen early, while uncertain tokens receive continued refinement. This timestep based ordering can be instantiated as either a fixed policy or an adaptive policy driven by task signals, thereby supporting a broad spectrum of refinement strategies. Because it operates purely at inference time, it applies uniformly across various DLMs and naturally extends to diverse supervision sources. Empirically, TTA improves controllability and fluency: on sentiment control, it yields more than 20 percent higher accuracy and nearly halves perplexity using less than one fifth the steps; in detoxification, it lowers maximum toxicity (12.2 versus 14.5) and perplexity (26.0 versus 32.0). Together, these results demonstrate that softened ordering via timestep allocation is the critical lever for mitigating update forgetting and achieving stable and controllable diffusion text generation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af98962b-9b69-4790-9999-5ce796477bb5Builds on34
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-SpacesJacob Austin, Daniel D. Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,256 citations
Related papers
- Diff4TST: Masked Diffusion Language Model for Text Style TransferXinchen Ma, Gaole He, Yunshi Lan, Weining QianACL 2026
- Don't Settle Too Early: Self-Reflective Remasking for Diffusion Language ModelsZemin Huang, Yuhang Wang, Zhiyang Chen, Guo-Jun QiICLR 2026 · 40 citations
- A2D: Any-Order, Any-Step Safety Alignment for Diffusion Language ModelsWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Yoonjun Cho, Dongjae Jeon et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- DiffusionBERT: Improving Generative Masked Language Models with Diffusion ModelsZhengfu He, Tianxiang Sun, Qiong Tang, Kuanning Wang et al.ACL 2023 · 63 citations
- DecoCal: Decoding with Calibration in Diffusion Large Language ModelsFan Xu, Huixuan Zhang, Xiaojun WanACL 2026
