On the Resilience of Biometric Authentication Systems against Random Inputs
Benjamin Zi Hao Zhao, Hassan Jameel Asghar, Mohamed Ali Kâafar
Abstract
We assess the security of machine learning based biometric authentication systems against an attacker who submits uniform random inputs, either as feature vectors or raw inputs, in order to find an accepting sample of a target user. The average false positive rate (FPR) of the system, i.e., the rate at which an impostor is incorrectly accepted as the legitimate user, may be interpreted as a measure of the success probability of such an attack. However, we show that the success rate is often higher than the FPR. In particular, for one reconstructed biometric system with an average FPR of 0.03, the success rate was as high as 0.78. This has implications for the security of the system, as an attacker with only the knowledge of the length of the feature space can impersonate the user with less than 2 attempts on average. We provide detailed analysis of why the attack is successful, and validate our results using four different biometric modalities and four different machine learning classifiers. Finally, we propose mitigation techniques that render such attacks ineffective, with little to no effect on the accuracy of the system.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Understanding Real-world Threats to Deep Learning Models in Android AppsZizhuang Deng, Kai Chen, Guozhu Meng, Xiaodong Zhang et al.CCS 2022 · 29 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
Builds on6
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Tracking Mobile Web Users Through Motion Sensors: Attacks and DefensesAnupam Das, Nikita Borisov, Matthew CaesarNDSS 2016 · 145 citations
- KEH-Gait: Towards a Mobile Healthcare User Authentication System by Kinetic Energy HarvestingWeitao Xu, Guohao Lan, Qi Lin, Sara Khalifa et al.NDSS 2017 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Casting the Net! Revisiting MasterFace Impersonation AttacksSeunghun Paik, Sunpill Kim, Chanwoo Hwang, Jae Hong SeoCCS 2026
- Am I a Real or Fake Celebrity? Evaluating Face Recognition and Verification APIs under Deepfake Impersonation AttackShahroz Tariq, Sowon Jeon, Simon S. WooWWW 2022 · 33 citations
- Rethinking the Reverse-engineering of Trojan TriggersZhenting Wang, Kai Mei, Hailun Ding, Juan Zhai et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 75 citations
- Combating False Data Injection Attacks on Human-Centric Sensing ApplicationsJingyu Xin, Vir V. Phoha, Asif SalekinUbiComp 2022 · 5 citations
- May the Force Not Be With You: Brute-Force Resistant Biometric Authentication and Key ReconstructionAlexandra Boldyreva, Deep Inder Mohan, Tianxin TangCCS 2025
