FaiRR: Faithful and Robust Deductive Reasoning over Natural Language
Soumya Sanyal, Harman Singh, Xiang Ren
Abstract
Transformers have been shown to be able to perform deductive reasoning on a logical rulebase containing rules and statements written in natural language. Recent works show that such models can also produce the reasoning steps (i.e., the proof graph) that emulate the model's logical reasoning process. Currently, these black-box models generate both the proof graph and intermediate inferences within the same model and thus may be unfaithful. In this work, we frame the deductive logical reasoning task by defining three modular components: rule selection, fact selection, and knowledge composition. The rule and fact selection steps select the candidate rule and facts to be used and then the knowledge composition combines them to generate new inferences. This ensures model faithfulness by assured causal relation from the proof step to the inference reasoning. To test our framework, we propose FAIRR (Faithful and Robust Reasoner) where the above three components are independently modeled by transformers. We observe that FAIRR is robust to novel language perturbations, and is faster at inference than previous works on existing reasoning datasets. Additionally, in contrast to black-box generative models, the errors made by FAIRR are more interpretable due to the modular approach. 1 1 The source code of FAIRR has been made available at https://github.com/INK-USC/FaiRR . fact1: Charlie is blue. fact2: Charlie is round. fact3: Erin is kind. fact4: Dave is round. rule1: If someone is blue then they are kind. rule2: Round, kind people are white. statement: Charlie is white. conc1: Charlie is kind.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af215a62-5c6d-4ec4-9819-e6654f2ee124Cited by top-tier papers13
- Learning Deductive Reasoning from Synthetic Corpus based on Formal LogicTerufumi Morishita, Gaku Morio, Atsuki Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro SogawaICML 2023 · 45 citations
- Generating Natural Language Proofs with Verifier-Guided SearchKaiyu Yang, Jia Deng, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2022 · 22 citations
- RECKONING: Reasoning through Dynamic Knowledge EncodingZeming Chen, Gail Weiss, Eric Mitchell, Asli Celikyilmaz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
- RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment TreesTengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 8 citations
- Faithful Question Answering with Monte-Carlo PlanningRuixin Hong, Hongming Zhang, Hong Zhao, Dong Yu et al.ACL 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- RobustLR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating Logical Robustness of Deductive ReasonersSoumya Sanyal, Zeyi Liao, Xiang RenEMNLP 2022 · 6 citations
- Can Transformers Reason Logically? A Study in SAT SolvingLeyan Pan, Vijay Ganesh, Jacob D. Abernethy, Chris Esposo et al.ICML 2025
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
- Learning to Disentangle Latent Reasoning Rules with Language VAEs: A Systematic StudyYingji Zhang, Marco Valentino, Danilo S. Carvalho, André FreitasAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Measuring Systematic Generalization in Neural Proof Generation with TransformersNicolas Gontier, Koustuv Sinha, Siva Reddy, Christopher PalNeurIPS 2020 · 69 citations
