Chronic Poisoning: Backdoor Attack against Split Learning
Fangchao Yu, Bo Zeng, Kai Zhao, Zhi Pang, Lina Wang
Abstract
Split learning is a computing resource-friendly distributed learning framework that protects client training data by splitting the model between the client and server. Previous work has proved that split learning faces a severe risk of privacy leakage, as a malicious server can recover the client's private data by hijacking the training process. In this paper, we first explore the vulnerability of split learning to server-side backdoor attacks, where our goal is to compromise the model's integrity. Since the server-side attacker cannot access the training data and client model in split learning, the traditional poisoning-based backdoor attack methods are no longer applicable. Therefore, constructing backdoor attacks in split learning poses significant challenges. Our strategy involves the attacker establishing a shadow model on the server side that can encode backdoor samples and guiding the client model to learn from this model during the training process, thereby enabling the client to acquire the same capability. Based on these insights, we propose a three-stage backdoor attack framework named SFI. Our attack framework minimizes assumptions about the attacker's background knowledge and ensures that the attack process remains imperceptible to the client. We implement SFI on various benchmark datasets, and extensive experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness and generality. For example, success rates of our attack on MNIST, Fashion, and CIFAR10 datasets all exceed 90%, with limited impact on the main task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aeecdd96-0a62-4520-ac4e-69d3d68602f4Cited by top-tier papers3
- Backdoor Attacks Against No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models via a Scalable TriggerYi Yu, Song Xia, Xun Lin, Wenhan Yang et al.AAAI 2025 · 15 citations
- SafeSplit: A Novel Defense Against Client-Side Backdoor Attacks in Split LearningPhillip Rieger, Alessandro Pegoraro, Kavita Kumari, Tigist Abera et al.NDSS 2025
- ZORRO: Zero-Knowledge Robustness and Privacy for Split LearningNojan Sheybani, Alessandro Pegoraro, Jonathan Knauer, Phillip Rieger et al.CCS 2025
Builds on8
- Blind Backdoors in Deep Learning ModelsEugene Bagdasaryan, Vitaly ShmatikovUSENIX Security 2021 · 372 citations
- Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split LearningOscar Li, Jiankai Sun, Xin Yang, Weihao Gao et al.ICLR 2022 · 170 citations
- Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split LearningDario Pasquini, Giuseppe Ateniese, Massimo BernaschiCCS 2021 · 14 citations
- Label Inference Attacks Against Vertical Federated LearningChong Fu, Xuhong Zhang, Shouling Ji, Jinyin Chen et al.USENIX Security 2022
- WaNet - Imperceptible Warping-based Backdoor AttackTuan Anh Nguyen, Anh Tuan TranICLR 2021
Related papers
- VILLAIN: Backdoor Attacks Against Vertical Split LearningYijie Bai, Yanjiao Chen, Hanlei Zhang, Wenyuan Xu et al.USENIX Security 2023
- SecureSplit: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Split LearningZhihao Dou, Dongfei Cui, Weida Wang, Anjun Gao et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- PCAT: Functionality and Data Stealing from Split Learning by Pseudo-Client AttackXinben Gao, Lan ZhangUSENIX Security 2023
- Backdoor Defense via Enhanced Splitting and Trap IsolationHongrui Yu, Lu Qi, Wanyu Lin, Jian Chen et al.ICCV 2025 · 5 citations
- IBA: Towards Irreversible Backdoor Attacks in Federated LearningThuy Dung Nguyen, Tuan Nguyen, Anh Tran, Khoa D. Doan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 94 citations
