Jagged Polynomial Commitments (or: How to Stack Multilinears)
Tamir Hemo, Kevin Jue, Eugene Rabinovich, Gyumin Roh, Ron D. Rothblum
Abstract
Modern SNARK constructions, almost ubiquitously, rely on a polynomial commitment scheme (PCS) --- a method by which a prover can commit to a large polynomial and later provide evaluation proofs of the form "P(x)=y" to the verifier.
In the context of zkVMs (i.e., proof-systems for general-purpose RAM computations), the common design is to represent the computation trace as a sequence of tables, one per CPU instruction, and commit to the these tables, or even their individual columns, as separate polynomials. Committing separately to these polynomials has a large overhead in verification costs, especially in hash-based systems.
In this work we drastically reduce this cost via a new construction which we call the jagged PCS. This PCS enables the prover to commit to the entire computation trace as a single polynomial, but then allows for the verifier to emulate access to the individual table or column polynomials, so that the arithmetization can proceed in the usual manner. The jagged PCS may be thought of as a sparse PCS for a very particular form of sparsity - namely, a "jagged" matrix in which each column has a different height.
Our construction of the jagged PCS is highly performant in practice. In contrast to existing sparse PCS constructions for general sparse polynomials, the jagged PCS does not require the prover to commit to any additional oracles and the prover cost is dominated by 5 finite field multiplications per element in the trace area. Furthermore, we implement the verifier as an arithmetic circuit that depends only on the total trace area - thereby significantly reducing the problem of "combinatorial explosion" often encountered in zkVM recursion.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- TensorSwitch: Nearly Optimal Polynomial Commitments from Tensor CodesBenedikt Bünz, Giacomo Fenzi, Ron D. Rothblum, William WangCRYPTO 2026
- Concretely Efficient Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitment from Standard AssumptionsIntak Hwang, Jinyeong Seo, Yongsoo SongCRYPTO 2024 · 9 citations
- Blaze: Fast SNARKs from Interleaved RAA CodesMartijn Brehm, Binyi Chen, Ben Fisch, Nicolas Resch et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 15 citations
- Bolt: Faster SNARKs from Sketched CodesKobi Gurkan, Andrija Novakovic, Ron D. RothblumCRYPTO 2026 · 4 citations
- Wasp: Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs from VOLEZhanpeng Guo, Zhelei Zhou, Yun Li, Chenkai Weng et al.CCS 2026
