Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents
Chung-En Sun, Sicun Gao, Tsui-Wei Weng
Abstract
Robustness remains a paramount concern in deep reinforcement learning (DRL), with randomized smoothing emerging as a key technique for enhancing this attribute. However, a notable gap exists in the performance of current smoothed DRL agents, often characterized by significantly low clean rewards and weak robustness. In response to this challenge, our study introduces innovative algorithms aimed at training effective smoothed robust DRL agents. We propose S-DQN and S-PPO, novel approaches that demonstrate remarkable improvements in clean rewards, empirical robustness, and robustness guarantee across standard RL benchmarks. Notably, our S-DQN and S-PPO agents not only significantly outperform existing smoothed agents by an average factor of under the strongest attack, but also surpass previous robustly-trained agents by an average factor of . This represents a significant leap forward in the field. Furthermore, we introduce Smoothed Attack, which is more effective in decreasing the rewards of smoothed agents than existing adversarial attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae9e77f9-49e1-44c7-80d8-5a9fd4af9abdCited by top-tier papers4
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Behavior ManipulationShojiro Yamabe, Kazuto Fukuchi, Jun SakumaICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- CAMP in the Odyssey: Provably Robust Reinforcement Learning with Certified Radius MaximizationDerui Wang, Kristen Moore, Diksha Goel, Minjune Kim et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Off-Policy Actor-Critic for Adversarial Observation Robustness: Virtual Alternative Training via Symmetric Policy EvaluationKosuke Nakanishi, Akihiro Kubo, Yuji Yasui, Shin IshiiICML 2025
- On the Tension Between Optimality and Adversarial Robustness in Policy OptimizationHaoran Li, Jiayu Lv, Congying Han, Zicheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on9
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State ObservationsHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Chaowei Xiao, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal AdversaryHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning, Cho-Jui HsiehICLR 2021 · 212 citations
- Denoised Smoothing: A Provable Defense for Pretrained ClassifiersHadi Salman, Mingjie Sun, Greg Yang, Ashish Kapoor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 191 citations
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial LossTuomas P. Oikarinen, Wang Zhang, Alexandre Megretski, Luca Daniel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 134 citations
- Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLYanchao Sun, Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Furong HuangICLR 2022 · 82 citations
Related papers
- Belief-Enriched Pessimistic Q-Learning against Adversarial State PerturbationsXiaolin Sun, Zizhan ZhengICLR 2024 · 4 citations
- CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional SmoothingFan Wu, Linyi Li, Zijian Huang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik et al.ICLR 2022 · 64 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning with Robust and Smooth PolicyQianli Shen, Yan Li, Haoming Jiang, Zhaoran Wang et al.ICML 2020 · 95 citations
- On the Robustness of Safe Reinforcement Learning under Observational PerturbationsZuxin Liu, Zijian Guo, Zhepeng Cen, Huan Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- Adversarial Policy Training against Deep Reinforcement LearningXian Wu, Wenbo Guo, Hua Wei, Xinyu XingUSENIX Security 2021 · 19 citations
