Exploring the impact of 360° movie cuts in users' attention
Carlos Marañes, Diego Gutierrez, Ana Serrano
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) has grown since the first devices for personal use became available on the market. However, the production of cinematographic content in this new medium is still in an early exploratory phase. The main reason is that cinematographic language in VR is still under development, and we still need to learn how to tell stories effectively. A key element in traditional film editing is the use of different cutting techniques, in order to transition seamlessly from one sequence to another. A fundamental aspect of these techniques is the placement and control over the camera. However, VR content creators do not have full control of the camera. Instead, users in VR can freely explore the 360° of the scene around them, which potentially leads to very different experiences. While this is desirable in certain applications such as VR games, it may hinder the experience in narrative VR. In this work, we perform a systematic analysis of users’ viewing behavior across cut boundaries while watching professionally edited, narrative 360° videos. We extend previous metrics for quantifying user behavior in order to support more complex and realistic footage, and we introduce two new metrics that allow us to measure users’ exploration in a variety of different complex scenarios. From this analysis, (i) we confirm that previous insights derived for simple content hold for professionally edited content, and (ii) we derive new insights that could potentially influence VR content creation, informing creators about the impact of different cuts in the audience’s behavior.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae693da7-e1af-4ec0-b554-404cf014de5fCited by top-tier papers4
- PLUME: Record, Replay, Analyze and Share User Behavior in 6DoF XR ExperiencesCharles Javerliat, Sophie Villenave, Pierre Raimbaud, Guillaume LavouéIEEE VR 2024 · 35 citations
- Bullet Comments for 360°VideoYijun Li, Jin-Chuan Shi, Fang-Lue Zhang, Miao WangIEEE VR 2022 · 20 citations
- Exploring Viewing Modalities in Cinematic Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Challenges in Evaluating User ExperienceYawen Zhang, Han Zhou, Zhoumingju Jiang, Zilu Tang et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- RadarVR: Exploring Spatiotemporal Visual Guidance in Cinematic VRSean J. Liu, Rorik Henrikson, Tovi Grossman, Michael Glueck et al.UIST 2023 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Jump Cut Effects in Cinematic Virtual Reality: Editing with the 30-degree Rule and 180-degree RuleJunjie Zhang, Lik-Hang Lee, Yuyang Wang, Shan Jin et al.IEEE VR 2024 · 6 citations
- View-Dependent Effects for 360° Virtual Reality VideoJeremy Hartmann, Stephen DiVerdi, Cuong Nguyen, Daniel VogelUIST 2020 · 6 citations
- Collaborative Online Learning with VR Video: Roles of Collaborative Tools and Shared Video ControlQiao Jin, Yu Liu, Ruixuan Sun, Chen Chen et al.CHI 2023 · 24 citations
- From FOMO to JOMO: Examining the Fear and Joy of Missing Out and Presence in a 360° Video Viewing ExperienceTanja Aitamurto, Andrea Stevenson Won, Sukolsak Sakshuwong, Byungdoo Kim et al.CHI 2021 · 38 citations
- Influence of Interactivity and Social Environments on User Experience and Social Acceptability in Virtual RealityMaurizio Vergari, Tanja Kojic, Francesco Vona, Franca Garzotto et al.IEEE VR 2021 · 36 citations
