A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality
Junhyung Park, Simon Buchholz, Bernhard Schölkopf, Krikamol Muandet
Abstract
Causality is a central concept in a wide range of research areas, yet there is still no universally agreed axiomatisation of causality. We view causality both as an extension of probability theory and as a study of what happens when one intervenes on a system, and argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. To that end, we propose the notion of a causal space, consisting of a probability space along with a collection of transition probability kernels, called causal kernels, that encode the causal information of the space. Our proposed framework is not only rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks including, for example, cycles, latent variables and stochastic processes. 1 Kolmogorov's axiomatisation is without doubt the standard in probability theory. However, we are aware of other, less popular frameworks, for example, one that is more amenable to Bayesian probability [34] , one based on game theory [59] and imprecise probabilities [61] . 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae536775-484c-47c4-8236-98f5e285cd43Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- Representation Learning via Invariant Causal MechanismsJovana Mitrovic, Brian McWilliams, Jacob C. Walker, Lars Holger Buesing et al.ICLR 2021 · 281 citations
- Weakly supervised causal representation learningJohann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Phillip Lippe, Taco S. CohenNeurIPS 2022 · 196 citations
- Probabilistic Reasoning Across the Causal HierarchyDuligur Ibeling, Thomas IcardAAAI 2020 · 35 citations
- A Causal Analysis of HarmSander Beckers, Hana Chockler, Joseph Y. HalpernNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Random Variables, Conditional Independence and Categories of Abstract Sample SpacesDario SteinLICS 2025 · 2 citations
- Formalizing and Falsifying Causal Pathways of Rare EventsAnahita Haghighat, Dominik JanzingICML 2026
- BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data FusionSiu Lun Chau, Jean-Francois Ton, Javier González, Yee Whye Teh et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- ROCK: Causal Inference Principles for Reasoning about Commonsense CausalityJiayao Zhang, Hongming Zhang, Weijie J. Su, Dan RothICML 2022 · 28 citations
- Reasoning About Actual Causes in Nondeterministic DomainsShakil M. Khan, Yves Lespérance, Maryam RostamigivAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
