Dialogue Coherence Assessment Without Explicit Dialogue Act Labels
Mohsen Mesgar, Sebastian Bücker, Iryna Gurevych
Abstract
Recent dialogue coherence models use the coherence features designed for monologue texts, e.g. nominal entities, to represent utterances and then explicitly augment them with dialogue-relevant features, e.g., dialogue act labels. It indicates two drawbacks, (a) semantics of utterances is limited to entity mentions, and (b) the performance of coherence models strongly relies on the quality of the input dialogue act labels. We address these issues by introducing a novel approach to dialogue coherence assessment. We use dialogue act prediction as an auxiliary task in a multi-task learning scenario to obtain informative utterance representations for coherence assessment. Our approach alleviates the need for explicit dialogue act labels during evaluation. The results of our experiments show that our model substantially (more than 20 accuracy points) outperforms its strong competitors on the Dai-lyDialogue corpus, and performs on par with them on the SwitchBoard corpus for ranking dialogues concerning their coherence. We release our source code 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ade9829b-6296-4502-9b99-71f61d78eaddCited by top-tier papers6
- User Satisfaction Estimation with Sequential Dialogue Act Modeling in Goal-oriented Conversational SystemsYang Deng, Wenxuan Zhang, Wai Lam, Hong Cheng et al.WWW 2022 · 34 citations
- FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level EvaluationChen Zhang, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Qiquan Zhang, Thomas Friedrichs et al.EMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- Modeling Structural Similarities between Documents for Coherence Assessment with Graph Convolutional NetworksWei Liu, Xiyan Fu, Michael StrubeACL 2023 · 3 citations
- Open-Domain Text Evaluation via Contrastive Distribution MethodsSidi Lu, Hongyi Liu, Asli Celikyilmaz, Tianlu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
- DEAM: Dialogue Coherence Evaluation using AMR-based Semantic ManipulationsSarik Ghazarian, Nuan Wen, Aram Galstyan, Nanyun PengACL 2022
Related papers
- Joint Modeling of Entities and Discourse Relations for Coherence AssessmentWei Liu, Michael StrubeEMNLP 2025
- Multi-Domain Dialogue Acts and Response Co-GenerationKai Wang, Junfeng Tian, Rui Wang, Xiaojun Quan et al.ACL 2020 · 46 citations
- Towards Quantifiable Dialogue Coherence EvaluationZheng Ye, Liucun Lu, Lishan Huang, Liang Lin et al.ACL 2021
- GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue SystemsLishan Huang, Zheng Ye, Jinghui Qin, Liang Lin et al.EMNLP 2020 · 73 citations
- RADE: Reference-Assisted Dialogue Evaluation for Open-Domain DialogueZhengliang Shi, Weiwei Sun, Shuo Zhang, Zhen Zhang et al.ACL 2023 · 5 citations
