Effects of Depth Information on Visual Target Identification Task Performance in Shared Gaze Environments
Austin Erickson, Nahal Norouzi, Kangsoo Kim, Joseph J. LaViola, Gerd Bruder, Gregory F. Welch
Abstract
Human gaze awareness is important for social and collaborative interactions. Recent technological advances in augmented reality (AR) displays and sensors provide us with the means to extend collaborative spaces with real-time dynamic AR indicators of one's gaze, for example via three-dimensional cursors or rays emanating from a partner's head. However, such gaze cues are only as useful as the quality of the underlying gaze estimation and the accuracy of the display mechanism. Depending on the type of the visualization, and the characteristics of the errors, AR gaze cues could either enhance or interfere with collaborations. In this paper, we present two human-subject studies in which we investigate the influence of angular and depth errors, target distance, and the type of gaze visualization on participants' performance and subjective evaluation during a collaborative task with a virtual human partner, where participants identified targets within a dynamically walking crowd. First, our results show that there is a significant difference in performance for the two gaze visualizations ray and cursor in conditions with simulated angular and depth errors: the ray visualization provided significantly faster response times and fewer errors compared to the cursor visualization. Second, our results show that under optimal conditions, among four different gaze visualization methods, a ray without depth information provides the worst performance and is rated lowest, while a combination of a ray and cursor with depth information is rated highest. We discuss the subjective and objective performance thresholds and provide guidelines for practitioners in this field.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get adccdb40-3ecd-4887-bd72-5e7b46d7eebdRelated papers
- Anticipation Without Acceleration: Benefits of Shared Gaze in Collocated Augmented Reality CollaborationJulian Rasch, Vladislav Dmitrievic Rusakov, Jan Leusmann, Florian Müller et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Assisting Manipulation and Grasping in Robot Teleoperation with Augmented Reality Visual CuesStephanie Arévalo Arboleda, Franziska Rücker, Tim Dierks, Jens GerkenCHI 2021 · 59 citations
- Depth Cue Conflicts Between Real and Virtual Objects Disrupt Visually-Guided Reaching in Augmented RealityDomenic Au, Robert S. Allison, Laurie M. WilcoxIEEE VR 2026 · 2 citations
- Speech-Augmented Cone-of-Vision for Exploratory Data AnalysisRiccardo Bovo, Daniele Giunchi, Ludwig Sidenmark, Joshua Newn et al.CHI 2023 · 12 citations
- Assessing Depth Perception in VR and Video See-Through AR: A Comparison on Distance Judgment, Performance, and PreferenceFranziska Westermeier, Larissa Brübach, Carolin Wienrich, Marc Erich LatoschikIEEE VR 2024 · 38 citations
