IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questions
James Ferguson, Matt Gardner, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Tushar Khot, Pradeep Dasigi
Abstract
Humans often have to read multiple documents to address their information needs. However, most existing reading comprehension (RC) tasks only focus on questions for which the contexts provide all the information required to answer them, thus not evaluating a system's performance at identifying a potential lack of sufficient information and locating sources for that information. To fill this gap, we present a dataset, IIRC, with more than 13K questions over paragraphs from English Wikipedia that provide only partial information to answer them, with the missing information occurring in one or more linked documents. The questions were written by crowd workers who did not have access to any of the linked documents, leading to questions that have little lexical overlap with the contexts where the answers appear. This process also gave many questions without answers, and those that require discrete reasoning, increasing the difficulty of the task. We follow recent modeling work on various reading comprehension datasets to construct a baseline model for this dataset, finding that it achieves 31.1% F1 on this task, while estimated human performance is 88.4%. The dataset, code for the baseline system, and a leaderboard can be found at https://allennlp.org/iirc .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext acfceafc-abc5-46d8-9ae9-df3bc8d14b31Cited by top-tier papers19
- A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Search AgentsYunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Yongzhao Xiao, Zheli Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 1,216 citations
- Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step QuestionsHarsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, Ashish SabharwalACL 2023 · 187 citations
- Turning Tables: Generating Examples from Semi-structured Tables for Endowing Language Models with Reasoning SkillsOri Yoran, Alon Talmor, Jonathan BerantACL 2022 · 57 citations
- ConditionalQA: A Complex Reading Comprehension Dataset with Conditional AnswersHaitian Sun, William W. Cohen, Ruslan SalakhutdinovACL 2022 · 41 citations
- Modeling Multi-hop Question Answering as Single Sequence PredictionSemih Yavuz, Kazuma Hashimoto, Yingbo Zhou, Nitish Shirish Keskar et al.ACL 2022 · 35 citations
Builds on3
- Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading ComprehensionZhuosheng Zhang, Junjie Yang, Hai ZhaoAAAI 2021 · 237 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
- Interactive Machine Comprehension with Information Seeking AgentsXingdi Yuan, Jie Fu, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yi Tay et al.ACL 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- English Machine Reading Comprehension Datasets: A SurveyDaria Dzendzik, Jennifer Foster, Carl VogelEMNLP 2021 · 8 citations
- DoQA - Accessing Domain-Specific FAQs via Conversational QAJon Ander Campos, Arantxa Otegi, Aitor Soroa, Jan Deriu et al.ACL 2020 · 2 citations
- MultiModalQA: complex question answering over text, tables and imagesAlon Talmor, Ori Yoran, Amnon Catav, Dan Lahav et al.ICLR 2021 · 229 citations
- Mitigating False-Negative Contexts in Multi-document Question Answering with Retrieval MarginalizationAnsong Ni, Matt Gardner, Pradeep DasigiEMNLP 2021 · 5 citations
- Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text ComprehensionWei-Jen Ko, Te-Yuan Chen, Yiyan Huang, Greg Durrett et al.EMNLP 2020 · 32 citations
