Effect of uncertainty visualizations on myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle in retirement investment decisions
Ryan Wesslen, Alireza Karduni, Douglas Markant, Wenwen Dou
Abstract
For many households, investing for retirement is one of the most significant decisions and is fraught with uncertainty. In a classic study in behavioral economics, Benartzi and Thaler (1999) found evidence using bar charts that investors exhibit myopic loss aversion in retirement decisions: Investors overly focus on the potential for short-term losses, leading them to invest less in riskier assets and miss out on higher long-term returns. Recently, advances in uncertainty visualizations have shown improvements in decision-making under uncertainty in a variety of tasks. In this paper, we conduct a controlled and incentivized crowdsourced experiment replicating Benartzi and Thaler (1999) and extending it to measure the effect of different uncertainty representations on myopic loss aversion. Consistent with the original study, we find evidence of myopic loss aversion with bar charts and find that participants make better investment decisions with longer evaluation periods. We also find that common uncertainty representations such as interval plots and bar charts achieve the highest mean expected returns while other uncertainty visualizations lead to poorer long-term performance and strong effects on the equity premium. Qualitative feedback further suggests that different uncertainty representations lead to visual reasoning heuristics that can either mitigate or encourage a focus on potential short-term losses. We discuss implications of our results on using uncertainty visualizations for retirement decisions in practice and possible extensions for future work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext acb7262f-c05e-4963-a89e-469cfc728e3bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
- Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and DecisionsAlex Kale, Matthew Kay, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 112 citations
- A Bayesian cognition approach for belief updating of correlation judgement through uncertainty visualizationsAlireza Karduni, Douglas Markant, Ryan Wesslen, Wenwen DouIEEE VIS 2020 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating the Use of Uncertainty Visualisations for Imputations of Data Missing At Random in ScatterplotsAbhraneel Sarma, Shunan Guo, Jane Hoffswell, Ryan A. Rossi et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 19 citations
- Revealing Perceptual Proxies with Adversarial ExamplesBrian D. Ondov, Fumeng Yang, Matthew Kay, Niklas Elmqvist et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 22 citations
- Studying Early Decision Making with Progressive Bar ChartsAmeya B. Patil, Gaëlle Richer, Christopher Jermaine, Dominik Moritz et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 11 citations
- My Model is Unfair, Do People Even Care? Visual Design Affects Trust and Perceived Bias in Machine LearningAimen Gaba, Zhanna Kaufman, Jason Cheung, Marie Shvakel et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 20 citations
- Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social OutcomesEli Holder, Cindy XiongIEEE VIS 2022 · 22 citations
