On Extending Direct Preference Optimization to Accommodate Ties
Jinghong Chen, Guangyu Yang, Weizhe Lin, Jingbiao Mei, Chenxu Lyu, Bill Byrne
Abstract
We derive and investigate two DPO variants that explicitly model the possibility of declaring a tie in pair-wise comparisons. We replace the Bradley-Terry model in DPO with two well-known modeling extensions, by Rao and Kupper and by Davidson, that assign probability to ties as alternatives to clear preferences. Our experiments in neural machine translation and summarization show that explicitly labeled ties can be added to the datasets for these DPO variants without the degradation in task performance that is observed when the same tied pairs are presented to DPO. We find empirically that the inclusion of ties leads to stronger regularization with respect to the reference policy as measured by KL divergence, and we see this even for DPO in its original form. We provide a theoretical explanation for this regularization effect using ideal DPO policy theory. We further show performance improvements over DPO in translation and mathematical reasoning using our DPO variants. We find it can be beneficial to include ties in preference optimization rather than simply discard them, as is done in common practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ac8bf1cc-35f6-4528-bd5b-49443842851cCited by top-tier papers4
- COOPERA: Continual Open-Ended Human-Robot AssistanceChenyang Ma, Kai Lu, Ruta Desai, Xavier Puig et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Learning Guarantee of Reward Modeling Using Deep Neural NetworksYuanhang Luo, Yeheng Ge, Ruijian Han, Guohao ShenKDD 2026 · 3 citations
- Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback: Wisdom of the CrowdShang Liu, Yu Pan, Guanting Chen, Xiaocheng LiICML 2025
- DPO Unchained: Your Training Algorithm is Secretly Disentangled in Human Choice Theory (and Its Loss' Convexity is Dispensable)Wenxuan Zhou, Shujian Zhang, brice magdalou, John Lambert et al.ICML 2026
Builds on14
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
- Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationTianqi Liu, Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman et al.ICLR 2024 · 346 citations
Related papers
- TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio MatchingTruong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Van, Duy Nguyen et al.ICML 2026
- TODO: Enhancing LLM Alignment with Ternary PreferencesYuxiang Guo, Lu Yin, Bo Jiang, Jiaqi ZhangICLR 2025
- Uncertainty-Aware Iterative Preference Optimization for Enhanced LLM ReasoningLei Li, Hehuan Liu, Yaxin Zhou, ZhaoYang Gui et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Reward Alignment Optimization: A Direct Point-wise Alignment ApproachZelin Li, Jia Leng, Dawei Song, Yangen HuACL 2026
- Spurious Correlation Learning in Preference Optimization: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Mitigation via Tie TrainingChristian Moya, Alex Semendinger, Guang Lin, Elliott ThornleyICML 2026 · 1 citation
