Full or Weak Annotations? An Adaptive Strategy for Budget-Constrained Annotation Campaigns
Javier Gamazo Tejero, Martin S. Zinkernagel, Sebastian Wolf, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo Márquez-Neila
Abstract
Annotating new datasets for machine learning tasks is tedious, time-consuming, and costly. For segmentation applications, the burden is particularly high as manual delineations of relevant image content are often extremely expensive or can only be done by experts with domain-specific knowledge. Thanks to developments in transfer learning and training with weak supervision, segmentation models can now also greatly benefit from annotations of different kinds. However, for any new domain application looking to use weak supervision, the dataset builder still needs to define a strategy to distribute full segmentation and other weak annotations. Doing so is challenging, however, as it is a priori unknown how to distribute an annotation budget for a given new dataset. To this end, we propose a novel approach to determine annotation strategies for segmentation datasets, whereby estimating what proportion of segmentation and classification annotations should be collected given a fixed budget. To do so, our method sequentially determines proportions of segmentation and classification annotations to collect for budget-fractions by modeling the expected improvement of the final segmentation model. We show in our experiments that our approach yields annotations that perform very close to the optimal for a number of different annotation budgets and datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Adaptive Data Collection for Robust Learning Across Multiple DistributionsChengbo Zang, Mehmet Kerem Türkcan, Gil Zussman, Zoran Kostic et al.ICML 2025
- Monotonic Variational Gaussian Process for Efficient Data CollectionDonghyun Lee, Young Myoung KoICML 2026
- Instance-wise Supervision-level Optimization in Active LearningShinnosuke Matsuo, Riku Togashi, Ryoma Bise, Seiichi Uchida et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on7
- Integral Object Mining via Online Attention AccumulationPeng-Tao Jiang, Qibin Hou, Yang Cao, Ming-Ming Cheng et al.ICCV 2019 · 246 citations
- Reinforced active learning for image segmentationArantxa Casanova, Pedro O. Pinheiro, Negar Rostamzadeh, Christopher J. PalICLR 2020 · 127 citations
- Optimizing Data Collection for Machine LearningRafid Mahmood, James Lucas, José M. Álvarez, Sanja Fidler et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- How Much More Data Do I Need? Estimating Requirements for Downstream TasksRafid Mahmood, James Lucas, David Acuna, Daiqing Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 21 citations
- Revisiting Superpixels for Active Learning in Semantic Segmentation With Realistic Annotation CostsLile Cai, Xun Xu, Jun Hao Liew, Chuan Sheng FooCVPR 2021
Related papers
- UniT: Unified Knowledge Transfer for Any-Shot Object Detection and SegmentationSiddhesh Khandelwal, Raghav Goyal, Leonid SigalCVPR 2021
- Every Annotation Counts: Multi-Label Deep Supervision for Medical Image SegmentationSimon Reiß, Constantin Seibold, Alexander Freytag, Erik Rodner et al.CVPR 2021
- Named Entity Recognition without Labelled Data: A Weak Supervision ApproachPierre Lison, Jeremy Barnes, Aliaksandr Hubin, Samia TouilebACL 2020 · 12 citations
- Cut out the annotator, keep the cutout: better segmentation with weak supervisionSarah M. Hooper, Michael Wornow, Ying Hang Seah, Peter Kellman et al.ICLR 2021 · 17 citations
- Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum LossVivien Cabannes, Alessandro Rudi, Francis R. BachICML 2020 · 50 citations
