EPIC: Explanation of Pretrained Image Classification Networks via Prototypes
Piotr Borycki, Magdalena Tredowicz, Szymon Janusz, Jacek Tabor, Przemyslaw Spurek, Arkadiusz Lewicki, Lukasz Struski
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) methods generally fall into two categories. Post-hoc approaches generate explanations for pre-trained models and are compatible with various neural network architectures. These methods often use feature importance visualizations, such as saliency maps, to indicate which input regions influenced the model's prediction. Unfortunately, they typically offer a coarse understanding of the model's decision-making process. In contrast, ante-hoc (inherently explainable) methods rely on specially designed model architectures trained from scratch. A notable subclass of these methods provides explanations through prototypes, representative patches extracted from the training data. However, prototype-based approaches have limitations: they require dedicated architectures, involve specialized training procedures, and perform well only on specific datasets. In this work, we propose EPIC (Explanation of Pretrained Image Classification), a novel approach that bridges the gap between these two paradigms. Like post-hoc methods, EPIC operates on pre-trained models without architectural modifications. Simultaneously, it delivers intuitive, prototype-based explanations inspired by ante-hoc techniques. To the best of our knowledge, EPIC is the first post-hoc method capable of fully replicating the core explanatory power of inherently interpretable models. We evaluate EPIC on benchmark datasets commonly used in prototype-based explanations, such as CUB-200-2011 and Stanford Cars, alongside large-scale datasets like ImageNet, typically employed by post-hoc methods. EPIC uses prototypes to explain model decisions, providing a flexible and easy-to-understand tool for creating clear, high-quality explanations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on3
- B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for InterpretabilityMoritz Böhle, Mario Fritz, Bernt SchieleCVPR 2022 · 62 citations
- Fast Axiomatic Attribution for Neural NetworksRobin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Stefan RothNeurIPS 2021 · 55 citations
- FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI MethodsRobin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Stefan RothICCV 2023 · 50 citations
Related papers
- Explain Any Concept: Segment Anything Meets Concept-Based ExplanationAo Sun, Pingchuan Ma, Yuanyuan Yuan, Shuai WangNeurIPS 2023 · 69 citations
- PIP-Net: Patch-Based Intuitive Prototypes for Interpretable Image ClassificationMeike Nauta, Jörg Schlötterer, Maurice van Keulen, Christin SeifertCVPR 2023
- Representational Difference ExplanationsNeehar Kondapaneni, Oisin Mac Aodha, Pietro PeronaNeurIPS 2025
- Post-hoc Part-Prototype NetworksAndong Tan, Fengtao Zhou, Hao ChenICML 2024 · 7 citations
- A Psychological Theory of ExplainabilityScott Cheng-Hsin Yang, Tomas Folke, Patrick ShaftoICML 2022 · 21 citations
