On the Structural Hardness of Answer Set Programming: Can Structure Efficiently Confine the Power of Disjunctions?
Markus Hecher, Rafael Kiesel
Abstract
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a generic problem modeling and solving framework with a strong focus on knowledge representation and a rapid growth of industrial applications. So far, the study of complexity resulted in characterizing hardness and determining their sources, fine-grained insights in the form of dichotomy-style results, as well as detailed parameterized complexity landscapes. Unfortunately, for the well-known parameter treewidth disjunctive programs require double-exponential runtime under reasonable complexity assumptions. This quickly becomes out of reach. We deal with the classification of structural parameters for disjunctive ASP on the program's rule structure (incidence graph). First, we provide a polynomial kernel to obtain single-exponential runtime in terms of vertex cover size, despite subset-minimization being not represented in the program’s structure. Then we turn our attention to strictly better structural parameters between vertex cover size and treewidth. Here, we provide double-exponential lower bounds for the most prominent parameters in that range: treedepth, feedback vertex size, and cliquewidth. Based on this, we argue that unfortunately our options beyond vertex cover size are limited. Our results provide an in-depth hardness study, relying on a novel reduction from normal to disjunctive programs, trading the increase of complexity for an exponential parameter compression.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on4
- Lower Bounds for QBFs of Bounded TreewidthJohannes Klaus Fichte, Markus Hecher, Andreas PfandlerLICS 2020 · 18 citations
- An Improved Parameterized Algorithm for TreewidthTuukka Korhonen, Daniel LokshtanovSTOC 2023 · 12 citations
- Approximating Pathwidth for Graphs of Small TreewidthCarla Groenland, Gwenaël Joret, Wojciech Nadara, Bartosz WalczakSODA 2021 · 6 citations
- Structure-Aware Lower Bounds and Broadening the Horizon of Tractability for QBFJohannes Klaus Fichte, Robert Ganian, Markus Hecher, Friedrich Slivovsky et al.LICS 2023 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Characterizing Structural Hardness of Logic Programs: What Makes Cycles and Reachability Hard for Treewidth?Markus HecherAAAI 2023 · 2 citations
- Treewidth-Aware Complexity in ASP: Not all Positive Cycles are Equally HardJorge Fandinno, Markus HecherAAAI 2021 · 10 citations
- Disjunctive Temporal Problems under Structural RestrictionsKonrad K. Dabrowski, Peter Jonsson, Sebastian Ordyniak, George OsipovAAAI 2021 · 2 citations
- Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic ProgramsMarkus Hecher, Michael Morak, Stefan WoltranAAAI 2020 · 15 citations
- Structure-Aware Encodings of Argumentation Properties for Clique-widthYasir Mahmood, Markus Hecher, Johanna Groven, Johannes Klaus FichteAAAI 2026
