Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment
Maria Refinetti, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Ruben Ohana, Sebastian Goldt
Abstract
Direct feedback alignment (DFA) is emerging as an efficient and biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation for training deep neural networks. Despite relying on random feedback weights for the backward pass, DFA successfully trains state-of-the-art models such as transformers. On the other hand, it notoriously fails to train convolutional networks. An understanding of the inner workings of DFA to explain these diverging results remains elusive. Here, we propose a theory of feedback alignment algorithms. We first show that learning in shallow networks proceeds in two steps: an alignment phase, where the model adapts its weights to align the approximate gradient with the true gradient of the loss function, is followed by a memorisation phase, where the model focuses on fitting the data. This two-step process has a degeneracy breaking effect: out of all the low-loss solutions in the landscape, a network trained with DFA naturally converges to the solution which maximises gradient alignment. We also identify a key quantity underlying alignment in deep linear networks: the conditioning of the alignment matrices. The latter enables a detailed understanding of the impact of data structure on alignment, and suggests a simple explanation for the well-known failure of DFA to train convolutional neural networks. Numerical experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10 clearly demonstrate degeneracy breaking in deep non-linear networks and show that the align-then-memorize process occurs sequentially from the bottom layers of the network to the top.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ab399b54-8e91-410d-8846-998d64d0d38eCited by top-tier papers13
- Error-driven Input Modulation: Solving the Credit Assignment Problem without a Backward PassGiorgia Dellaferrera, Gabriel KreimanICML 2022 · 80 citations
- Can Forward Gradient Match Backpropagation?Louis Fournier, Stéphane Rivaud, Eugene Belilovsky, Michael Eickenberg et al.ICML 2023 · 33 citations
- Forward Learning with Top-Down Feedback: Empirical and Analytical CharacterizationRavi Francesco Srinivasan, Francesca Mignacco, Martino Sorbaro, Maria Refinetti et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Dual Propagation: Accelerating Contrastive Hebbian Learning with Dyadic NeuronsRasmus Kjær Høier, D. Staudt, Christopher ZachICML 2023 · 14 citations
- How to Train Your Wide Neural Network Without Backprop: An Input-Weight Alignment PerspectiveAkhilan Boopathy, Ila FieteICML 2022 · 14 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Learning representations for binary-classification without backpropagationMathias LechnerICLR 2020 · 6 citations
- Scaling Direct Feedback Learning with Jacobian Alignment GuaranteesPaul Caillon, Erwan Fagnou, Blaise Delattre, Alexandre AllauzenICLR 2026
- Convergence and Alignment of Gradient Descent with Random Backpropagation WeightsGanlin Song, Ruitu Xu, John LaffertyNeurIPS 2021 · 4 citations
- Activation Sharing with Asymmetric Paths Solves Weight Transport Problem without Bidirectional ConnectionSunghyeon Woo, Jeongwoo Park, Jiwoo Hong, Dongsuk JeonNeurIPS 2021 · 3 citations
- Kernelized information bottleneck leads to biologically plausible 3-factor Hebbian learning in deep networksRoman Pogodin, Peter E. LathamNeurIPS 2020 · 48 citations
