Subliminal Effects in Your Data: A General Mechanism via Log-Linearity
Ishaq Aden-Ali, Noah Golowich, Allen Liu, Abhishek Shetty, Ankur Moitra, Nika Haghtalab
Abstract
Training modern large language models (LLMs) has become a veritable smorgasbord of algorithms and datasets designed to elicit particular behaviors, making it critical to develop techniques to understand the effects of datasets on the model's properties. This is exacerbated by recent experiments that show datasets can transmit signals that are not directly observable from individual datapoints (Halawi et al., 2024; Betley et al., 2025b;Cloud et al., 2025; Betley et al., 2025a), posing a conceptual challenge for dataset-centric understandings of LLM training and suggesting a missing fundamental account of such phenomena. Towards understanding such effects, inspired by recent work on the linear structure of LLMs (Park et al., 2024; Golowich et al., 2025b), we uncover a general mechanism through which hidden subtexts can arise in generic datasets. We introduce LOGIT-LINEAR SELECTION (LLS), a method that prescribes how to select subsets of a generic preference dataset to elicit a wide range of hidden effects. We apply LLS to discover subsets of real-world datasets so that models trained on them exhibit behaviors ranging from having specific preferences, to responding to prompts in a different language not present in the dataset, to taking on a different persona. Crucially, the effect persists for the selected subset, across models with varying architectures, supporting its generality and universality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language ModelsBohan Li, Hao Zhou, Junxian He, Mingxuan Wang et al.EMNLP 2020 · 538 citations
Related papers
- LLM See, LLM Do: Leveraging Active Inheritance to Target Non-Differentiable ObjectivesLuísa Shimabucoro, Sebastian Ruder, Julia Kreutzer, Marzieh Fadaee et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Your Language Model Secretly Contains Personality SubnetworksRuimeng Ye, Zihan Wang, Zinan Ling, Yang Xiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual PreferencesThomas P. Zollo, Andrew Wei Tung Siah, Naimeng Ye, Ang Li et al.ICLR 2025
- BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded DataWenkai Li, Jiarui Liu, Andy Liu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ACL 2025
- Data Selection for LLM Alignment Using Fine-Grained PreferencesJia Zhang, Yao Liu, Chen-Xi Zhang, Yi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
