Classical Planning with Avoid Conditions
Marcel Steinmetz, Jörg Hoffmann, Alisa Kovtunova, Stefan Borgwardt
Abstract
It is often natural in planning to specify conditions that should be avoided, characterizing dangerous or highly undesirable behavior. PDDL3 supports this with temporal-logic state trajectory constraints. Here we focus on the simpler case where the constraint is a non-temporal formula ? - the avoid condition - that must be false throughout the plan. We design techniques tackling such avoid conditions effectively. We show how to learn from search experience which states necessarily lead into ?, and we show how to tailor abstractions to recognize that avoiding ? will not be possible starting from a given state. We run a large-scale experiment, comparing our techniques against compilation methods and against simple state pruning using ?. The results show that our techniques are often superior.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aac8e77b-1127-4c25-986c-99acd6a70e25Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Dealing with Numeric and Metric Time Constraints in PDDL3 via Compilation to Numeric PlanningLuigi Bonassi, Alfonso Emilio Gerevini, Enrico ScalaAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- Regret-Free Reinforcement Learning for Temporal Logic SpecificationsRupak Majumdar, Mahmoud Salamati, Sadegh SoudjaniICML 2025
- Constrained LTL Specification Learning from ExamplesChangjian Zhang, Parv Kapoor, Ian Dardik, Leyi Cui et al.ICSE 2025 · 4 citations
- Automatic Synthesis of Smooth Infinite Horizon Paths Satisfying Linear Temporal Logic SpecificationsSamuel Williams, Jyotirmoy DeshmukhCAV 2025
- Deductive Synthesis of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Infinite Horizon TasksYuning Wang, He ZhuCAV 2025
