ImProver: Agent-Based Automated Proof Optimization
Riyaz Ahuja, Jeremy Avigad, Prasad Tetali, Sean Welleck
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been used to generate formal proofs of mathematical theorems in proofs assistants such as Lean. However, we often want to optimize a formal proof with respect to various criteria, depending on its downstream use. For example, we may want a proof to adhere to a certain style, or to be readable, concise, or modularly structured. Having suitably optimized proofs is also important for learning tasks, especially since human-written proofs may not optimal for that purpose. To this end, we study a new problem of automated proof optimization: rewriting a proof so that it is correct and optimizes for an arbitrary criterion, such as length or readability. As a first method for automated proof optimization, we present ImProver, a large-language-model agent that rewrites proofs to optimize arbitrary user-defined metrics in Lean. We find that naively applying LLMs to proof optimization falls short, and we incorporate various improvements into ImProver, such as the use of symbolic Lean context in a novel Chain-of-States technique, as well as error-correction and retrieval. We test ImProver on rewriting real-world undergraduate, competition, and research-level mathematics theorems, finding that ImProver is capable of rewriting proofs so that they are substantially shorter, more modular, and more readable.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa917dbe-a2f9-41f5-9c29-34e7779af322Cited by top-tier papers2
- ProofOptimizer: Training Language Models to Simplify Proofs without Human DemonstrationsAlex Gu, Bartosz Piotrowski, Fabian Gloeckle, Kaiyu Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Beyond Theorem Proving: Formulation, Framework and Benchmark for Formal Problem-SolvingQi Liu, Xinhao Zheng, Renqiu Xia, Xingzhi Qi et al.ICML 2026
Builds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingGuillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 271 citations
- Proof Artifact Co-Training for Theorem Proving with Language ModelsJesse Michael Han, Jason Rute, Yuhuai Wu, Edward W. Ayers et al.ICLR 2022 · 149 citations
Related papers
- LeanAgent: Lifelong Learning for Formal Theorem ProvingAdarsh Kumarappan, Mo Tiwari, Peiyang Song, Robert Joseph George et al.ICLR 2025
- DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree SearchHuajian Xin, Z. Z. Ren, Junxiao Song, Zhihong Shao et al.ICLR 2025
- Towards Language Model Guided TLA+ Proof AutomationYuhao Zhou, Stavros TripakisFM 2026 · 1 citation
- FormalML: A Benchmark for Evaluating Formal Subgoal Completion in Machine Learning TheoryXiao-Wen Yang, Zihao Zhang, Jianuo Cao, Zhi Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- SITA: A Framework for Structure-to-Instance Theorem AutoformalizationChenyi Li, Wanli Ma, Zichen Wang, Zaiwen WenAAAI 2026
