Leveraging Public-Private Blockchain Interoperability for Closed Consortium Interfacing
Bishakh Chandra Ghosh, Tanay Bhartia, Sourav Kanti Addya, Sandip Chakraborty
Abstract
With the increasing adoption of private blockchain platforms, consortia operating in various sectors such as trade, finance, logistics, etc., are becoming common. Despite having the benefits of a completely decentralized architecture which supports transparency and distributed control, existing private blockchains limit the data, assets, and processes within its closed boundary, which restricts secure and verifiable service provisioning to the end-consumers. Thus, platforms such as e-commerce with multiple sellers or cloud federation with a collection of cloud service providers cannot be decentralized with the existing blockchain platforms. This paper proposes a decentralized gateway architecture interfacing private blockchain with end-users by leveraging the unique combination of public and private blockchain platforms through interoperation. Through the use case of decentralized cloud federations, we have demonstrated the viability of the solution. Our testbed implementation with Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric, with three service providers, shows that such consortium can operate within an acceptable response latency while scaling up to 64 parallel requests per second for cloud infrastructure provisioning. Further analysis over the Mininet emulation platform indicates that the platform can scale well with minimal impact over the latency as the number of participating service providers increases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa6dc57f-5ca2-4d06-80dd-b71eb3ccf9bbCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2018 · 1,145 citations
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 769 citations
- Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts PlatformMustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn et al.NDSS 2018 · 313 citations
- Anonymous Multi-Hop Locks for Blockchain Scalability and InteroperabilityGiulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Clara Schneidewind, Aniket Kate et al.NDSS 2019 · 305 citations
- Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness CosigningEwa Syta, Iulia Tamas, Dylan Visher, David Isaac Wolinsky et al.S&P 2016 · 285 citations
Related papers
- Blockchains vs. Distributed Databases: Dichotomy and FusionPingcheng Ruan, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Dumitrel Loghin, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 68 citations
- Distributed Broadcast Encryption for Confidential Interoperability across Private BlockchainsAngelo De Caro, Kaoutar Elkhiyaoui, Sandeep Nishad, Sikhar Patranabis et al.NDSS 2026
- Why Do My Blockchain Transactions Fail?: A Study of Hyperledger FabricJeeta Ann Chacko, Ruben Mayer, Hans-Arno JacobsenSIGMOD 2021 · 70 citations
- HyperService: Interoperability and Programmability Across Heterogeneous BlockchainsZhuotao Liu, Yangxi Xiang, Jian Shi, Peng Gao et al.CCS 2019 · 128 citations
- When Private Blockchain Meets Deterministic DatabaseZiliang Lai, Chris Liu, Eric LoSIGMOD 2023 · 22 citations
