Lune

EMNLP Findings2021

How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropy

Sara Rajaee, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar

Abstract

It is widely accepted that fine-tuning pretrained language models usually brings about performance improvements in downstream tasks. However, there are limited studies on the reasons behind this effectiveness, particularly from the viewpoint of structural changes in the embedding space. Trying to fill this gap, in this paper, we analyze the extent to which the isotropy of the embedding space changes after fine-tuning. We demonstrate that, even though isotropy is a desirable geometrical property, fine-tuning does not necessarily result in isotropy enhancements. Moreover, local structures in pre-trained contextual word representations (CWRs), such as those encoding token types or frequency, undergo a massive change during fine-tuning. Our experiments show dramatic growth in the number of elongated directions in the embedding space, which, in contrast to pre-trained CWRs, carry the essential linguistic knowledge in the fine-tuned embedding space, making existing isotropy enhancement methods ineffective.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 7 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers7

  1. Implicit Multimodal Alignment: On the Generalization of Frozen LLMs to Multimodal InputsMustafa Shukor, Matthieu CordNeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
  2. Stable Anisotropic RegularizationWilliam Rudman, Carsten EickhoffICLR 2024 · 13 citations
  3. Reliable Measures of Spread in High Dimensional Latent SpacesAnna C. Marbut, Katy McKinney-Bock, Travis J. WheelerICML 2023 · 5 citations
  4. On the Relation Between Fine-Tuning, Topological Properties, and Task Performance in Sense-Enhanced EmbeddingsDeniz Ekin Yavas, Timothée Bernard, Benoît Crabbé, Laura KallmeyerACL 2025 · 1 citation
  5. Voices in a Crowd: Searching for clusters of unique perspectivesNikolas Vitsakis, Amit Parekh, Ioannis KonstasEMNLP 2024

Builds on11

  1. On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language ModelsBohan Li, Hao Zhou, Junxian He, Mingxuan Wang et al.EMNLP 2020 · 538 citations
  2. Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTZhiyong Wu, Yun Chen, Ben Kao, Qun LiuACL 2020 · 158 citations
  3. Improving Neural Language Generation with Spectrum ControlLingxiao Wang, Jing Huang, Kevin Huang, Ziniu Hu et al.ICLR 2020 · 94 citations
  4. Isotropy in the Contextual Embedding Space: Clusters and ManifoldsXingyu Cai, Jiaji Huang, Yuchen Bian, Kenneth ChurchICLR 2021 · 50 citations
  5. How transfer learning impacts linguistic knowledge in deep NLP models?Nadir Durrani, Hassan Sajjad, Fahim DalviACL Findings 2021 · 39 citations

Related papers

  1. A Closer Look at How Fine-tuning Changes BERTYichu Zhou, Vivek SrikumarACL 2022 · 84 citations
  2. Is anisotropy really the cause of BERT embeddings not being semantic?Alejandro Fuster Baggetto, Víctor FresnoEMNLP Findings 2022 · 9 citations
  3. An Isotropy Analysis in the Multilingual BERT Embedding SpaceSara Rajaee, Mohammad Taher PilehvarACL Findings 2022 · 24 citations
  4. Less is More: Local Intrinsic Dimensions of Contextual Language ModelsBenjamin Matthias Ruppik, Julius von Rohrscheidt, Carel van Niekerk, Michael Heck et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
  5. Exploring Anisotropy and Outliers in Multilingual Language Models for Cross-Lingual Semantic Sentence SimilarityKatharina Hämmerl, Alina Fastowski, Jindrich Libovický, Alexander FraserACL Findings 2023 · 2 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines