Spectral Bias Outside the Training Set for Deep Networks in the Kernel Regime
Benjamin Bowman, Guido F. Montúfar
Abstract
We provide quantitative bounds measuring the difference in function space between the trajectory of a finite-width network trained on finitely many samples from the idealized kernel dynamics of infinite width and infinite data. An implication of the bounds is that the network is biased to learn the top eigenfunctions of the Neural Tangent Kernel not just on the training set but over the entire input space. This bias depends on the model architecture and input distribution alone and thus does not depend on the target function which does not need to be in the RKHS of the kernel. The result is valid for deep architectures with fully connected, convolutional, and residual layers. Furthermore the width does not need to grow polynomially with the number of samples in order to obtain high probability bounds up to a stopping time. The proof exploits the low-effective-rank property of the Fisher Information Matrix at initialization, which implies a low effective dimension of the model (far smaller than the number of parameters). We conclude that local capacity control from the low effective rank of the Fisher Information Matrix is still underexplored theoretically.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa2fe565-91f8-4d15-9467-3b68918f15f5Cited by top-tier papers6
- A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformersRiccardo Rende, Federica Gerace, Alessandro Laio, Sebastian GoldtNeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
- Generalization in Kernel Regression Under Realistic AssumptionsDaniel Barzilai, Ohad ShamirICML 2024 · 22 citations
- Once Read is Enough: Domain-specific Pretraining-free Language Models with Cluster-guided Sparse Experts for Long-tail Domain KnowledgeFang Dong, Mengyi Chen, Jixian Zhou, Yubin Shi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Train Faster, Perform Better: Modular Adaptive Training in Over-Parameterized ModelsYubin Shi, Yixuan Chen, Mingzhi Dong, Xiaochen Yang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Characterizing the spectrum of the NTK via a power series expansionMichael Murray, Hui Jin, Benjamin Bowman, Guido MontúfarICLR 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on14
- Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform DensityRonen Basri, Meirav Galun, Amnon Geifman, David W. Jacobs et al.ICML 2020 · 229 citations
- Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networksZiwei Ji, Matus TelgarskyICLR 2020 · 193 citations
- On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantChaoyue Liu, Libin Zhu, Mikhail BelkinNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Finite Depth and Width Corrections to the Neural Tangent KernelBoris Hanin, Mihai NicaICLR 2020 · 169 citations
- Dynamics of Deep Neural Networks and Neural Tangent HierarchyJiaoyang Huang, Horng-Tzer YauICML 2020 · 167 citations
Related papers
- Tight Bounds on the Smallest Eigenvalue of the Neural Tangent Kernel for Deep ReLU NetworksQuynh Nguyen, Marco Mondelli, Guido F. MontúfarICML 2021 · 98 citations
- Finite-Width Neural Tangent Kernels from Feynman DiagramsMax Guillen, Philipp Misof, Jan GerkenICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural NetworksLechao Xiao, Jeffrey Pennington, Samuel Stern SchoenholzICML 2020 · 91 citations
- Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? - A Neural Tangent Kernel PerspectiveKaixuan Huang, Yuqing Wang, Molei Tao, Tuo ZhaoNeurIPS 2020 · 107 citations
- What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?Guillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Pascal FrossardNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
