Leveraging Pedagogical Theories to Understand Student Learning Process with Graph-based Reasonable Knowledge Tracing
Jiajun Cui, Hong Qian, Bo Jiang, Wei Zhang
Abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) is a crucial task in intelligent education, focusing on predicting students' performance on given questions to trace their evolving knowledge. The advancement of deep learning in this field has led to deep-learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models that prioritize high predictive accuracy. However, many existing DLKT methods overlook the fundamental goal of tracking students' dynamical knowledge mastery. These models do not explicitly model knowledge mastery tracing processes or yield unreasonable results that educators find difficulty to comprehend and apply in real teaching scenarios. In response, our research conducts a preliminary analysis of mainstream KT approaches to highlight and explain such unreasonableness. We introduce GRKT, a graph-based reasonable knowledge tracing method to address these issues. By leveraging graph neural networks, our approach delves into the mutual influences of knowledge concepts, offering a more accurate representation of how the knowledge mastery evolves throughout the learning process. Additionally, we propose a fine-grained and psychological three-stage modeling process as knowledge retrieval, memory strengthening, and knowledge learning/forgetting, to conduct a more reasonable knowledge tracing process. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that GRKT outperforms eleven baselines across three datasets, not only enhancing predictive accuracy but also generating more reasonable knowledge tracing results. This makes our model a promising advancement for practical implementation in educational settings. The source code is available at https://github.com/JJCui96/GRKT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa153dd6-7b69-4c30-ba02-1dca5dca4354Cited by top-tier papers2
- Exploring Heterogeneity and Uncertainty for Graph-based Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Intelligent EducationPengyang Shao, Yonghui Yang, Chen Gao, Lei Chen et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
- CSG: Cognitive Structure Generation for Intelligent EducationHengnian Gu, Zhifu Chen, Yuxin Chen, Jin Zhou et al.ICML 2026
Builds on6
- Learning Process-consistent Knowledge TracingShuanghong Shen, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Zhenya Huang et al.KDD 2021 · 149 citations
- Assessing Student's Dynamic Knowledge State by Exploring the Question Difficulty EffectShuanghong Shen, Zhenya Huang, Qi Liu, Yu Su et al.SIGIR 2022 · 114 citations
- Tracing Knowledge Instead of Patterns: Stable Knowledge Tracing with Diagnostic TransformerYu Yin, Le Dai, Zhenya Huang, Shuanghong Shen et al.WWW 2023 · 103 citations
- Learning Behavior-oriented Knowledge TracingBihan Xu, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu, Shuanghong Shen et al.KDD 2023 · 55 citations
- Leveraging Transferable Knowledge Concept Graph Embedding for Cold-Start Cognitive DiagnosisWeibo Gao, Hao Wang, Qi Liu, Fei Wang et al.SIGIR 2023 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Introducing Problem Schema with Hierarchical Exercise Graph for Knowledge TracingHanshuang Tong, Zhen Wang, Yun Zhou, Shiwei Tong et al.SIGIR 2022 · 33 citations
- DyGKT: Dynamic Graph Learning for Knowledge TracingKe Cheng, Linzhi Peng, Pengyang Wang, Junchen Ye et al.KDD 2024 · 19 citations
- Deep Attentive Model for Knowledge TracingXinping Wang, Liangyu Chen, Min ZhangAAAI 2023 · 10 citations
- Question Difficulty Consistent Knowledge TracingGuimei Liu, Huijing Zhan, Jung-Jae KimWWW 2024 · 23 citations
- Interpretable Knowledge Tracing with Multiscale State RepresentationJianwen Sun, Fenghua Yu, Qian Wan, Qing Li et al.WWW 2024 · 41 citations
