Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensions
Carl Hvarfner, Erik Orm Hellsten, Luigi Nardi
Abstract
High-dimensional problems have long been considered the Achilles' heel of Bayesian optimization algorithms. Spurred by the curse of dimensionality, a large collection of algorithms aim to make it more performant in this setting, commonly by imposing various simplifying assumptions on the objective. In this paper, we identify the degeneracies that make vanilla Bayesian optimization poorly suited to high-dimensional tasks, and further show how existing algorithms address these degeneracies through the lens of lowering the model complexity. Moreover, we propose an enhancement to the prior assumptions that are typical to vanilla Bayesian optimization algorithms, which reduces the complexity to manageable levels without imposing structural restrictions on the objective. Our modification - a simple scaling of the Gaussian process lengthscale prior with the dimensionality - reveals that standard Bayesian optimization works drastically better than previously thought in high dimensions, clearly outperforming existing state-of-the-art algorithms on multiple commonly considered real-world high-dimensional tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa087d99-bd70-48d8-a56d-acd613735386Cited by top-tier papers27
- Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic RegularizationMichael S. Yao, Yimeng Zeng, Hamsa Bastani, Jacob R. Gardner et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- GIT-BO: High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Tabular Foundation ModelsRosen Ting-Ying Yu, Cyril Picard, Faez AhmedICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic ProgrammingPaul Brunzema, Sebastian TrimpeNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Regional Expected Improvement for Efficient Trust Region Selection in High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationNobuo Namura, Sho TakemoriAAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Adaptive Acquisition Selection for Bayesian Optimization with Large Language ModelsGiang Ngo, Dat Phan Trong, Dang Nguyen, Sunil Gupta et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on16
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian OptimizationSebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 280 citations
- Learning Search Space Partition for Black-box Optimization using Monte Carlo Tree SearchLinnan Wang, Rodrigo Fonseca, Yuandong TianNeurIPS 2020 · 163 citations
- Re-Examining Linear Embeddings for High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationBenjamin Letham, Roberto Calandra, Akshara Rai, Eytan BakshyNeurIPS 2020 · 152 citations
- PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-GuaranteesJonas Rothfuss, Vincent Fortuin, Martin Josifoski, Andreas KrauseICML 2021 · 136 citations
Related papers
- Understanding High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationLeonard Papenmeier, Matthias Poloczek, Luigi NardiICML 2025
- Standard Gaussian Process is All You Need for High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationZhitong Xu, Haitao Wang, Jeff M. Phillips, Shandian ZheICLR 2025
- BOIDS: High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Incumbent-Guided Direction Lines and Subspace EmbeddingsLam Ngo, Huong Ha, Jeffrey Chan, Hongyu ZhangAAAI 2025
- Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian OptimizationErik Bodin, Markus Kaiser, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Zhenwen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 11 citations
- Relaxing the Additivity Constraints in Decentralized No-Regret High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationAnthony Bardou, Patrick Thiran, Thomas BeginICLR 2024 · 10 citations
