Meta-learning with negative learning rates
Alberto Bernacchia
Abstract
Deep learning models require a large amount of data to perform well. When data is scarce for a target task, we can transfer the knowledge gained by training on similar tasks to quickly learn the target. A successful approach is meta-learning, or "learning to learn" a distribution of tasks, where "learning" is represented by an outer loop, and "to learn" by an inner loop of gradient descent. However, a number of recent empirical studies argue that the inner loop is unnecessary and more simple models work equally well or even better. We study the performance of MAML as a function of the learning rate of the inner loop, where zero learning rate implies that there is no inner loop. Using random matrix theory and exact solutions of linear models, we calculate an algebraic expression for the test loss of MAML applied to mixed linear regression and nonlinear regression with overparameterized models. Surprisingly, while the optimal learning rate for adaptation is positive, we find that the optimal learning rate for training is always negative, a setting that has never been considered before. Therefore, not only does the performance increase by decreasing the learning rate to zero, as suggested by recent work, but it can be increased even further by decreasing the learning rate to negative values. These results help clarify under what circumstances meta-learning performs best.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a9a27955-5539-48c9-9a33-cd4b2bbb6a50Cited by top-tier papers10
- How to Train Your MAML to Excel in Few-Shot ClassificationHan-Jia Ye, Wei-Lun ChaoICLR 2022 · 61 citations
- Meta-AdaM: An Meta-Learned Adaptive Optimizer with Momentum for Few-Shot LearningSiyuan Sun, Hongyang GaoNeurIPS 2023 · 51 citations
- MAML and ANIL Provably Learn RepresentationsLiam Collins, Aryan Mokhtari, Sewoong Oh, Sanjay ShakkottaiICML 2022 · 38 citations
- Statistically and Computationally Efficient Linear Meta-representation LearningKiran Koshy Thekumparampil, Prateek Jain, Praneeth Netrapalli, Sewoong OhNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Understanding Benign Overfitting in Gradient-Based Meta LearningLisha Chen, Songtao Lu, Tianyi ChenNeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
Builds on10
- A Baseline for Few-Shot Image ClassificationGuneet Singh Dhillon, Pratik Chaudhari, Avinash Ravichandran, Stefano SoattoICLR 2020 · 640 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
- Provable Meta-Learning of Linear RepresentationsNilesh Tripuraneni, Chi Jin, Michael I. JordanICML 2021 · 218 citations
- Unraveling Meta-Learning: Understanding Feature Representations for Few-Shot TasksMicah Goldblum, Steven Reich, Liam Fowl, Renkun Ni et al.ICML 2020 · 82 citations
- Meta-learning for Mixed Linear RegressionWeihao Kong, Raghav Somani, Zhao Song, Sham M. Kakade et al.ICML 2020 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Unraveling Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning via The Adaptation Learning RateYingtian Zou, Fusheng Liu, Qianxiao LiICLR 2022 · 11 citations
- Provable Generalization of Overparameterized Meta-learning Trained with SGDYu Huang, Yingbin Liang, Longbo HuangNeurIPS 2022 · 14 citations
- Theoretical Characterization of the Generalization Performance of Overfitted Meta-LearningPeizhong Ju, Yingbin Liang, Ness B. ShroffICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Meta-Learning with Adaptive HyperparametersSungyong Baik, Myungsub Choi, Janghoon Choi, Heewon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 164 citations
- Convergence of Meta-Learning with Task-Specific Adaptation over Partial ParametersKaiyi Ji, Jason D. Lee, Yingbin Liang, H. Vincent PoorNeurIPS 2020 · 97 citations
