Latent Learning Progress Drives Autonomous Goal Selection in Human Reinforcement Learning
Gaia Molinaro, Cédric Colas, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Anne Collins
Abstract
Humans are autotelic agents who learn by setting and pursuing their own goals. However, the precise mechanisms guiding human goal selection remain unclear. Learning progress, typically measured as the observed change in performance, can provide a valuable signal for goal selection in both humans and artificial agents. We hypothesize that human choices of goals may also be driven by latent learning progress, which humans can estimate through knowledge of their actions and the environment - even without experiencing immediate changes in performance. To test this hypothesis, we designed a hierarchical reinforcement learning task in which human participants (N = 175) repeatedly chose their own goals and learned goal-conditioned policies. Our behavioral and computational modeling results confirm the influence of latent learning progress on goal selection and uncover inter-individual differences, partially mediated by recognition of the environment's hierarchical structure. By investigating the role of latent learning progress in human goal selection, we pave the way for more effective and personalized learning experiences as well as the advancement of more human-like autotelic machines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a9644076-bd49-48d6-873c-2ecd8a694828Builds on6
- Skew-Fit: State-Covering Self-Supervised Reinforcement LearningVitchyr Pong, Murtaza Dalal, Steven Lin, Ashvin Nair et al.ICML 2020 · 303 citations
- Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal Reinforcement LearningSilviu Pitis, Harris Chan, Stephen Zhao, Bradly C. Stadie et al.ICML 2020 · 145 citations
- Language as a Cognitive Tool to Imagine Goals in Curiosity Driven ExplorationCédric Colas, Tristan Karch, Nicolas Lair, Jean-Michel Dussoux et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 139 citations
- Learning with AMIGo: Adversarially Motivated Intrinsic GoalsAndres Campero, Roberta Raileanu, Heinrich Küttler, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICLR 2021 · 48 citations
- Curiosity-Driven Exploration via Latent Bayesian SurprisePietro Mazzaglia, Ozan Çatal, Tim Verbelen, Bart DhoedtAAAI 2022 · 44 citations
Related papers
- MAGELLAN: Metacognitive predictions of learning progress guide autotelic LLM agents in large goal spacesLoris Gaven, Thomas Carta, Clément Romac, Cédric Colas et al.ICML 2025
- Hierarchical Goal Abstractions via Learned Subset RelationsFabian Wurzberger, Sebastian Gottwald, Zeqiang Zhang, Daniel A BraunICML 2026
- Deep Hierarchical Planning from PixelsDanijar Hafner, Kuang-Huei Lee, Ian Fischer, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2022 · 153 citations
- Possibility Before Utility: Learning And Using Hierarchical AffordancesRobby Costales, Shariq Iqbal, Fei ShaICLR 2022 · 5 citations
- Chain-of-Goals Hierarchical Policy for Long-Horizon Offline Goal-Conditioned RLJinwoo Choi, Sang-Hyun Lee, Seung-Woo SeoICML 2026 · 3 citations
