SCOUT: Teaching Pre-trained Language Models to Enhance Reasoning via Flow Chain-of-Thought
Guanghao Li, Wenhao Jiang, Mingfeng Chen, Yan Li, Hao Yu, Shuting Dong, Tao Ren, Ming Tang, Chun Yuan
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) by encouraging step-by-step thinking. However, CoTbased methods depend on intermediate reasoning steps, which limits scalability and generalization. Recent work explores recursive reasoning, where LLMs reuse internal layers across iterations to refine latent representations without explicit CoT supervision. While promising, these approaches often require costly pretraining and lack a principled framework for how reasoning should evolve across iterations. We address this gap by introducing Flow Chain-of-Thought (Flow CoT), a reasoning paradigm that models recursive inference as a progressive trajectory of latent cognitive states. Flow CoT frames each iteration as a distinct cognitive stage-deepening reasoning across iterations without relying on manual supervision. To realize this, we propose SCOUT (Stepwise Cognitive Optimization Using Teachers), a lightweight fine-tuning framework that enables Flow CoT-style reasoning without the need for pretraining. SCOUT uses progressive distillation to align each iteration with a teacher of appropriate capacity, and a cross-attention-based retrospective module that integrates outputs from previous iterations while preserving the model's original computation flow. Experiments across eight reasoning benchmarks show that SCOUT consistently improves both accuracy and explanation quality, achieving up to 1.8% gains under fine-tuning. Qualitative analyses further reveal that SCOUT enables progressively deeper reasoning across iterations-refining both belief formation and explanation granularity. These results not only validate the effectiveness of SCOUT, but also demonstrate the practical viability of Flow CoT as a scalable framework for enhancing reasoning in LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a95ac47e-ed4e-41f6-98a7-9130c5b1def0Builds on27
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher AssistantSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Ang Li, Nir Levine et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,361 citations
- On the Efficacy of Knowledge DistillationJang Hyun Cho, Bharath HariharanICCV 2019 · 741 citations
Related papers
- Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMsHaritz Puerto, Tilek Chubakov, Xiaodan Zhu, Harish Tayyar Madabushi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- UniCoTT: A Unified Framework for Structural Chain-of-Thought DistillationXianwei Zhuang, Zhihong Zhu, Zhichang Wang, Xuxin Cheng et al.ICLR 2025
- Why Prompt Design Matters and Works: A Complexity Analysis of Prompt Search Space in LLMsXiang Zhang, Juntai Cao, Chenyu You, Dujian DingACL 2025 · 21 citations
- Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-StepLiunian Harold Li, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu, Xiang Ren et al.ACL 2023 · 34 citations
- Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 102 citations
