Stable Cinemetrics : Structured Taxonomy and Evaluation for Professional Video Generation
Agneet Chatterjee, Rahim Entezari, Maksym Zhuravinskyi, Maksim Lapin, Reshinth Adithyan, Amit Raj, Chitta Baral, Yezhou Yang, Varun Jampani
Abstract
Recent advances in video generation have enabled high-fidelity video synthesis from user provided prompts. However, existing models and benchmarks fail to capture the complexity and requirements of professional video generation. Towards that goal, we introduce Stable Cinemetrics, a structured evaluation framework that formalizes filmmaking controls into four disentangled, hierarchical taxonomies: Setup, Event, Lighting, and Camera. Together, these taxonomies define 76 fine-grained control nodes grounded in industry practices. Using these taxonomies, we construct a benchmark of prompts aligned with professional use cases and develop an automated pipeline for prompt categorization and question generation, enabling independent evaluation of each control dimension. We conduct a large-scale human study spanning 10+ models and 20K videos, annotated by a pool of 80+ film professionals. Our analysis, both coarse and fine-grained reveal that even the strongest current models exhibit significant gaps, particularly in Events and Camera-related controls. To enable scalable evaluation, we train an automatic evaluator, a vision-language model aligned with expert annotations that outperforms existing zero-shot baselines. SCINE is the first approach to situate professional video generation within the landscape of video generative models, introducing taxonomies centered around cinematic controls and supporting them with structured evaluation pipelines and detailed analyses to guide future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a906f7a5-a18b-4fd9-bb78-5a23c49fba7cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Improving Video Generation with Human FeedbackJie Liu, Gongye Liu, Jiajun Liang, Ziyang Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 284 citations
- VisionReward: Fine-Grained Multi-Dimensional Human Preference Learning for Image and Video GenerationJiazheng Xu, Yu Huang, Jiale Cheng, Yuanming Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 112 citations
- Evaluation of Text-to-Video Generation Models: A Dynamics PerspectiveMingxiang Liao, Hannan Lu, Qixiang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 89 citations
- VACE: All-in-One Video Creation and EditingZeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang et al.ICCV 2025 · 58 citations
Related papers
- EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation ModelsYaofang Liu, Xiaodong Cun, Xuebo Liu, Xintao Wang et al.CVPR 2024
- T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video GenerationKaiyue Sun, Kaiyi Huang, Xian Liu, Yue Wu et al.CVPR 2025
- ShotBench: Expert-Level Cinematic Understanding in Vision-Language ModelsHongbo Liu, Jingwen He, Yi Jin, Dian Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 24 citations
- VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative ModelsZiqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang et al.CVPR 2024
- IVEBench: Modern Benchmark Suite for Instruction-Guided Video Editing AssessmentYinan Chen, Jiangning Zhang, Teng Hu, Yuxiang Zeng et al.ICLR 2026 · 29 citations
