Participatory Design in Precarity: "Smart" Technologies for Tiny House Villages
Esther Han Beol Jang, Kunsang Choden, Jason C. Young, Jennifer R. Webster, Emma Jean Slager, Christopher J. Webb, Kurtis Heimerl
Abstract
In tiny house villages (THVs), land ownership, local regulations such as zoning, and management frameworks affect how formerly unhoused residents can leverage and augment their built infrastructure with ''smart'' technologies. These dynamics influence THV residents' lived experiences, creating both constraints and opportunities for deploying networked sensors in support of communication, physical security, and shared governance. Through a series of participatory design (PD) workshops and visits with residents of two villages, we identified how residents balance privacy and security concerns when considering Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensor design and deployment. We find, for example, that residents impose constraints on designed sensors for the group's protection, such as a strict ban on camera-based visual or audio surveillance and a preference for local as opposed to cloud data storage. They also identify opportunities for diverse sensors and actuators to improve village accessibility and to alleviate resource sharing tensions. Meanwhile, differences between public and private land ownership directly impact the regulation and infrastructure possibilities for THVs, and historical and current zoning of land shapes the social problems that the community must navigate. Our findings deepen the CSCW research agenda by examining parameters for successful ''smart'' and data-driven technology interventions among low-resourced urban groups experiencing housing precarity and homelessness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a8b024f2-1890-43e5-83aa-4baa8581d9d2Builds on4
- HCI Tactics for Politics from Below: Meeting the Challenges of Smart CitiesCedric Deslandes Whitney, Teresa Naval, Elizabeth Quepons, Simrandeep Singh et al.CHI 2021 · 76 citations
- "Who is the right homeless client?": Values in Algorithmic Homelessness Service Provision and Machine Learning ResearchDilruba Showkat, Angela D. R. Smith, Lingqing Wang, Alexandra ToCHI 2023 · 18 citations
- Network Capacity as Common Pool Resource: Community-Based Congestion Management in a Community NetworkMatthew William Johnson, Esther Han Beol Jang, Frankie O'Rourke, Rachel Ye et al.CSCW 2021 · 12 citations
- "The Network Is an Excuse": Hardware Maintenance Supporting CommunityPhilip Garrison, Esther Han Beol Jang, Michael A. Lithgow, Nicolás Andrés PaceCSCW 2021 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Signs of the Smart City: Exploring the Limits and Opportunities of TransparencyEric Corbett, Graham DoveCHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Negotiating Autonomy, Control, and Privacy in Always-On Home IoT Technology-Mediated Care Relationships with Older AdultsShengzhi Wang, Neilly H. Tan, Sean A. MunsonUbiComp 2026 · 1 citation
- "How Do You Not Lose Friends?": Synthesizing a Design Space of Social Controls for Securing Shared Digital Resources Via Participatory Design JamsEyitemi Moju-Igbene, Hanan Abdi, Alan Lu, Sauvik DasUSENIX Security 2022
- Understanding Older Adults' Participation in Design WorkshopsAlisha Pradhan, Ben Jelen, Katie A. Siek, Joel Chan et al.CHI 2020 · 73 citations
- Investigating Tangible Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms for Future Smart HomesMaximiliane Windl, Albrecht Schmidt, Sebastian S. FegerCHI 2023 · 39 citations
