Lune

EMNLP Findings2023

PivotFEC: Enhancing Few-shot Factual Error Correction with a Pivot Task Approach using Large Language Models

Xingwei He, A-Long Jin, Jun Ma, Yuan Yuan, Siu Ming Yiu

Abstract

Factual Error Correction (FEC) aims to rectify false claims by making minimal revisions to align them more accurately with supporting evidence. However, the lack of datasets containing false claims and their corresponding corrections has impeded progress in this field. Existing distantly supervised models typically employ the mask-then-correct paradigm, where a masker identifies problematic spans in false claims, followed by a corrector to predict the masked portions. Unfortunately, accurately identifying errors in claims is challenging, leading to issues like over-erasure and incorrect masking. To overcome these challenges, we present PivotFEC, a method that enhances fewshot FEC with a pivot task approach using large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we introduce a pivot task called factual error injection, which leverages LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT) to intentionally generate text containing factual errors under few-shot settings; then, the generated text with factual errors can be used to train the FEC corrector. Our experiments on a public dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of PivotFEC in two significant ways: Firstly, it improves the widely-adopted SARI metrics by 11.3 compared to the best-performing distantly supervised methods. Secondly, it outperforms its few-shot counterpart (i.e., LLMs are directly used to solve FEC) by 7.9 points in SARI, validating the efficacy of our proposed pivot task.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on17

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  3. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
  4. BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
  5. TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact VerificationWenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 674 citations

Related papers

  1. Improving Factual Error Correction by Learning to Inject Factual ErrorsXingwei He, Qianru Zhang, A-Long Jin, Jun Ma et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
  2. Converge to the Truth: Factual Error Correction via Iterative Constrained EditingJiangjie Chen, Rui Xu, Wenxuan Zeng, Changzhi Sun et al.AAAI 2023 · 13 citations
  3. Evidence-based Factual Error CorrectionJames Thorne, Andreas VlachosACL 2021
  4. The student becomes the master: Outperforming GPT3 on Scientific Factual Error CorrectionDhananjay Ashok, Atharva Kulkarni, Hai Pham, Barnabás PóczosEMNLP Findings 2023
  5. FAME: Towards Factual Multi-Task Model EditingZeng Li, Yingyu Shan, Zeming Liu, Jiashu Yao et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines