Constructive Post-Quantum Reductions
Nir Bitansky, Zvika Brakerski, Yael Tauman Kalai
Abstract
Is it possible to convert classical reductions into post-quantum ones? It is customary to argue that while this is problematic in the interactive setting, non-interactive reductions do carry over. However, when considering quantum auxiliary input, this conversion results in a non-constructive post-quantum reduction that requires duplicating the quantum auxiliary input, which is in general inefficient or even impossible. This violates the win-win premise of provable cryptography: an attack against a cryptographic primitive should lead to an algorithmic advantage.
We initiate the study of constructive quantum reductions and present positive and negative results for converting large classes of classical reductions to the post-quantum setting in a constructive manner. We show that any non-interactive non-adaptive reduction from assumptions with a polynomial solution space (such as decision assumptions) can be made post-quantum constructive. In contrast, assumptions with super-polynomial solution space (such as general search assumptions) cannot be generally converted.
Along the way, we make several additional contributions:
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a81e4c04-8f17-4aa6-8dc5-b4e233ebe21dCited by top-tier papers4
- Cloning Games: A General Framework for Unclonable PrimitivesPrabhanjan Ananth, Fatih Kaleoglu, Qipeng LiuCRYPTO 2023 · 17 citations
- Publicly-Verifiable Deletion via Target-Collapsing FunctionsJames Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Alexander PorembaCRYPTO 2023 · 14 citations
- An Efficient Quantum Parallel Repetition Theorem and ApplicationsJohn Bostanci, Luowen Qian, Nicholas Spooner, Henry YuenSTOC 2024 · 4 citations
- Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum ArgumentsAndrew Huang, Yael Tauman KalaiFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Hidden Cosets and Applications to Unclonable CryptographyAndrea Coladangelo, Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2021 · 64 citations
- The Measure-and-Reprogram Technique 2.0: Multi-round Fiat-Shamir and MoreJelle Don, Serge Fehr, Christian MajenzCRYPTO 2020 · 61 citations
- Classical vs Quantum Random OraclesTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2021 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Quantum Advantage from One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
- Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding BarrierAlessandro Chiesa, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2021 · 30 citations
- On the Impossibility of SNARGs with Short CRS : (or: Revisiting Gentry-Wichs Barrier in the Non-adaptive Setting)Liyan Chen, Zhengzhong JinFOCS 2025 · 4 citations
- A Black-Box Approach to Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge in Constant RoundsNai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2021 · 16 citations
- Black-Box Separations for Non-interactive Classical Commitments in a Quantum WorldKai-Min Chung, Yao-Ting Lin, Mohammad MahmoodyEUROCRYPT 2023 · 7 citations
