FedInverse: Evaluating Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning
Di Wu, Jun Bai, Yiliao Song, Junjun Chen, Wei Zhou, Yong Xiang, Atul Sajjanhar
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning technique where multiple devices (such as smartphones or IoT devices) train a shared global model by using their local data. FL promises better data privacy as the individual data isn't shared with servers or other participants. However, this research uncovers a groundbreaking insight: a model inversion (MI) attacker, who acts as a benign participant, can invert the shared global model and obtain the data belonging to other participants. In such scenarios, distinguishing between attackers and benign participants becomes challenging, leading to severe data-leakage risk in FL. In addition, we found even the most advanced defense approaches could not effectively address this issue. Therefore, it is important to evaluate such data-leakage risks of an FL system before using it. Motivated by that, we propose FedInverse to evaluate whether the FL global model can be inverted by MI attackers. In particular, FedInverse can be optimized by leveraging the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) as a regularizer to adjust the diversity of the MI attack generator. We test FedInverse with three typical MI attackers, GMI, KED-MI, and VMI. The experiments show that FedInverse can effectively evaluate the data leakage risk that attackers successfully obtain the data belonging to other participants. The code of this work is available at https://github.com/Jun-B0518/FedInverse
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a808a7ff-590f-4f5b-82c3-b7f1f8d86055Cited by top-tier papers2
- A Unified Solution to Diverse Heterogeneities in One-Shot Federated LearningJun Bai, Yiliao Song, Di Wu, Atul Sajjanhar et al.KDD 2025
- Legal Judgment Prediction: A Reflection on the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2026
Builds on11
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- Variational Model Inversion AttacksKuan-Chieh Wang, Yan Fu, Ke Li, Ashish Khisti et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 142 citations
Related papers
- FedInv: Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning by Inversing Local Model UpdatesBo Zhao, Peng Sun, Tao Wang, Keyu JiangAAAI 2022 · 82 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Enhancing Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning via Learning Rate PerturbationGuangnian Wan, Haitao Du, Xuejing Yuan, Jun Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 2 citations
- Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated LearningJunyi Zhu, Ruicong Yao, Matthew B. BlaschkoICML 2023 · 17 citations
- FLShield: A Validation Based Federated Learning Framework to Defend Against Poisoning AttacksEhsanul Kabir, Zeyu Song, Md. Rafi Ur Rashid, Shagufta MehnazS&P 2024 · 32 citations
