To Recommend or Not to Recommend: Designing and Evaluating AI-Enabled Decision Support for Time-Critical Medical Events
Angela Mastrianni, Mary Suhyun Kim, Travis M. Sullivan, Genevieve J. Sippel, Randall S. Burd, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Aleksandra Sarcevic
Abstract
AI-enabled decision-support systems aim to help medical providers rapidly make decisions with limited information during medical emergencies. A critical challenge in developing these systems is supporting providers in interpreting the system output to make optimal treatment decisions. In this study, we designed and evaluated an AI-enabled decision-support system to aid providers in treating patients with traumatic injuries. We first conducted user research with physicians to identify and design information types and AI outputs for a decision-support display. We then conducted an online experiment with 35 medical providers from six health systems to evaluate two human-AI interaction strategies: (1) AI information synthesis and (2) AI information and recommendations. We found that providers were more likely to make correct decisions when AI information and recommendations were provided compared to receiving no AI support. We also identified two socio-technical barriers to providing AI recommendations during time-critical medical events: (1) an accuracy-time trade-off in providing recommendations and (2) polarizing perceptions of recommendations between providers. We discuss three implications for developing AI-enabled decision support used in timecritical events, contributing to the limited research on human-AI interaction in this context.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7baf947-458a-4972-95f9-8e36f22a862bBuilds on24
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-MakingHelena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg et al.CSCW 2023 · 362 citations
- "Brilliant AI Doctor" in Rural Clinics: Challenges in AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support System DeploymentDakuo Wang, Liuping Wang, Zhan Zhang, Ding Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 207 citations
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Decision Making: Considering Collaboration and Agency in the Design of AI-Based Decision-Support Systems for Fast-Response Medical TeamsAngela Mastrianni, Paige Kmetz-Cutrone, Kathryn Chang, Jonathan Y. Stein et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health CareVenkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn et al.CHI 2023 · 126 citations
- Understanding the impact of explanations on advice-taking: a user study for AI-based clinical Decision Support SystemsCecilia Panigutti, Andrea Beretta, Fosca Giannotti, Dino PedreschiCHI 2022 · 129 citations
- Human-Algorithmic Interaction Using a Large Language Model-Augmented Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision Support SystemNiroop Channa Rajashekar, Yeo Eun Shin, Yuan Pu, Sunny Chung et al.CHI 2024 · 85 citations
- Healthcare AI Treatment Decision Support: Design Principles to Enhance Clinician Adoption and TrustEleanor R. Burgess, Ivana Jankovic, Melissa Austin, Nancy Cai et al.CHI 2023 · 65 citations
