Disentangling and Integrating Relational and Sensory Information in Transformer Architectures
Awni Altabaa, John Lafferty
Abstract
Relational reasoning is a central component of generally intelligent systems, enabling robust and data-efficient inductive generalization. Recent empirical evidence shows that many existing neural architectures, including Transformers, struggle with tasks requiring relational reasoning. In this work, we distinguish between two types of information: sensory information about the properties of individual objects, and relational information about the relationships between objects. While neural attention provides a powerful mechanism for controlling the flow of sensory information between objects, the Transformer lacks an explicit computational mechanism for routing and processing relational information. To address this limitation, we propose an architectural extension of the Transformer framework that we call the Dual Attention Transformer (DAT), featuring two distinct attention mechanisms: sensory attention for directing the flow of sensory information, and a novel relational attention mechanism for directing the flow of relational information. We empirically evaluate DAT on a diverse set of tasks ranging from synthetic relational benchmarks to complex real-world tasks such as language modeling and visual processing. Our results demonstrate that integrating explicit relational computational mechanisms into the Transformer architecture leads to significant performance gains in terms of data efficiency and parameter efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7a71fcb-d341-4e02-a12e-78c4c740bd50Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
Related papers
- Abstractors and relational cross-attention: An inductive bias for explicit relational reasoning in TransformersAwni Altabaa, Taylor Whittington Webb, Jonathan D. Cohen, John LaffertyICLR 2024 · 13 citations
- When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?Enric Boix-Adserà, Omid Saremi, Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Relational Attention: Generalizing Transformers for Graph-Structured TasksCameron Diao, Ricky LoyndICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Slot Abstractors: Toward Scalable Abstract Visual ReasoningShanka Subhra Mondal, Jonathan D. Cohen, Taylor Whittington WebbICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Distributional Associations vs In-Context Reasoning: A Study of Feed-forward and Attention LayersLei Chen, Joan Bruna, Alberto BiettiICLR 2025
