Improved Scaling Laws in Linear Regression via Data Reuse
Licong Lin, Jingfeng Wu, Peter L. Bartlett
Abstract
Neural scaling laws suggest that the test error of large language models trained online decreases polynomially as the model size and data size increase. However, such scaling can be unsustainable when running out of new data. In this work, we show that data reuse can improve existing scaling laws in linear regression. Specifically, we derive sharp test error bounds on -dimensional linear models trained by multi-pass stochastic gradient descent (multi-pass SGD) on data with sketched features. Assuming that the data covariance has a power-law spectrum of degree , and that the true parameter follows a prior with an aligned power-law spectrum of degree (with ), we show that multi-pass SGD achieves a test error of , where is the number of iterations. In the same setting, one-pass SGD only attains a test error of (see e.g., Lin et al., 2024). This suggests an improved scaling law via data reuse (i.e., choosing ) in data-constrained regimes. Numerical simulations are also provided to verify our theoretical findings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a78db843-fa21-446e-b725-4dcceb26067cCited by top-tier papers5
- Larger Datasets Can Be Repeated More: A Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Epoch Scaling in Linear RegressionTingkai Yan, Haodong Wen, Binghui Li, Kairong Luo et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Full-Batch Gradient Descent Outperforms One-Pass SGD: Sample Complexity Separation in Single-Index LearningFilip Kovačević, Hong Chang Ji, Denny Wu, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Scaling Laws of SignSGD in Linear Regression: When Does It Outperform SGD?Jihwan Kim, Dogyoon Song, Chulhee YunICLR 2026
- Improved Scaling Laws via Weak-to-Strong Generalization in Random Features Ridge RegressionDiyuan Wu, Lehan Chen, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Marco MondelliICML 2026
- Less Data, Faster Training: repeating smaller datasets speeds up learning via sampling biasesJingwen Liu, Ezra Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Bingbin LiuICML 2026
Builds on20
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 475 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
- The Quantization Model of Neural ScalingEric J. Michaud, Ziming Liu, Uzay Girit, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2023 · 179 citations
- Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and VisionIbrahim M. Alabdulmohsin, Behnam Neyshabur, Xiaohua ZhaiNeurIPS 2022 · 171 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and DataLicong Lin, Jingfeng Wu, Sham M. Kakade, Peter L. Bartlett et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 57 citations
- Analyzing Neural Scaling Laws in Two-Layer Networks with Power-Law Data SpectraRoman Worschech, Bernd RosenowICLR 2025
- Data Efficient Neural Scaling Law via Model ReusingPeihao Wang, Rameswar Panda, Zhangyang WangICML 2023 · 18 citations
- A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling LawsBlake Bordelon, Alexander B. Atanasov, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2024 · 84 citations
- Functional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate SchedulesBinghui Li, Fengling Chen, Zixun Huang, Lean Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
