Generative Adversarial Post-Training Mitigates Reward Hacking in Live Human-AI Music Interaction
Yusong Wu, Stephen Brade, Teng Ma, Tia-Jane Fowler, Enning Yang, Berker Banar, Aaron Courville, Natasha Jaques, Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang
Abstract
Most applications of generative AI involve a sequential interaction in which a person inputs a prompt and waits for a response, and where reaction time and adaptivity are not important factors. In contrast, live jamming is a collaborative interaction that requires real-time coordination and adaptation without access to the other player's future moves, while preserving diversity to sustain a creative flow. Reinforcement learning post-training enables effective adaptation through on-policy interaction, yet it often reduces output diversity by exploiting coherence-based rewards. This collapse, known as "reward hacking", affects many RL post-training pipelines, but is especially harmful in live jamming, where musical creativity relies on dynamic variation and mutual responsiveness. In this paper, we propose a novel adversarial training method on policy-generated trajectories to mitigate reward hacking in RL post-training for melody-to-chord accompaniment. A co-evolving discriminator separates policy trajectories from the data distribution, while the policy maximizes the discriminator output in addition to coherence rewards to prevent collapse to trivial outputs. We evaluate accompaniment quality and output diversity in simulation with both fixed test melodies and learned melody agents, and we conduct a user study with the model deployed in a realtime interactive system with expert musicians. Quantitative evaluation and user feedback demonstrate improved output diversity, harmonic coherence, adaptation speed and user agency. Our results demonstrate a simple yet effective method to mitigate reward hacking in RL post-training of generative sequence models. 1 * Equal contribution as senior authors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a76ffb8a-3907-4356-94e5-846209a55327Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Defining and Characterizing Reward GamingJoar Skalse, Nikolaus H. R. Howe, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, David KruegerNeurIPS 2022 · 466 citations
- AMP: adversarial motion priors for stylized physics-based character controlXue Bin Peng, Ze Ma, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey Levine et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 392 citations
Related papers
- Adaptive Accompaniment with ReaLchordsYusong Wu, Tim Cooijmans, Kyle Kastner, Adam Roberts et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
- RL-Duet: Online Music Accompaniment Generation Using Deep Reinforcement LearningNan Jiang, Sheng Jin, Zhiyao Duan, Changshui ZhangAAAI 2020 · 56 citations
- Reward Hacking Benchmark: Measuring Exploits in LLM Agents with Tool UseKunvar ThamanICML 2026 · 14 citations
- On Teacher Hacking in Language Model DistillationDaniil Tiapkin, Daniele Calandriello, Johan Ferret, Sarah Perrin et al.ICML 2025
- RLAC: Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Critic for Free-Form Generation TasksMian Wu, Gavin Zhang, Sewon Min, Sergey Levine et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
