C3oT: Generating Shorter Chain-of-Thought Without Compromising Effectiveness
Yu Kang, Xianghui Sun, Liangyu Chen, Wei Zou
Abstract
Generating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) before deriving the answer can effectively improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and significantly improve the accuracy of the generated answer. However, in most cases, the length of the generated CoT is much longer than the desired final answer, which results in additional decoding costs. Furthermore, existing research has discovered that shortening the reasoning steps in CoT, even while preserving the key information, diminishes LLMs' abilities. These phenomena make it difficult to use LLMs and CoT in many real-world applications that only require the final answer and are sensitive to latency, such as search and recommendation. To reduce the costs of model decoding and shorten the length of the generated CoT, this paper presents Conditioned Compressed Chain-of-Thought (C3oT), a CoT compression framework that involves a compressor to compress an original longer CoT into a shorter CoT while maintaining key information and interpretability, a conditioned training method to train LLMs with both longer CoT and shorter CoT simultaneously to learn the corresponding relationships between them, and a conditioned inference method to gain the reasoning ability learned from longer CoT by generating shorter CoT. We conduct experiments over four datasets from arithmetic and commonsense scenarios, showing that the proposed method is capable of compressing the length of generated CoT by up to more than 50% without compromising its effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a766e6b3-d873-45d8-b709-b570bb39fc90Cited by top-tier papers63
- Training Language Models to Reason EfficientlyDaman Arora, Andrea ZanetteNeurIPS 2025 · 270 citations
- Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning ModelsChenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Yongjie Duan, Zheliang Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
- CoT-Valve: Length-Compressible Chain-of-Thought TuningXinyin Ma, Guangnian Wan, Runpeng Yu, Gongfan Fang et al.ACL 2025 · 162 citations
- Thinkless: LLM Learns When to ThinkGongfan Fang, Xinyin Ma, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2025 · 128 citations
- CPPO: Accelerating the Training of Group Relative Policy Optimization-Based Reasoning ModelsZhihang Lin, Mingbao Lin, Yuan Xie, Rongrong JiNeurIPS 2025 · 116 citations
Builds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsGuangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickaël Seznec, Hao Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 1,493 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- Can Reasoning Path still be Effective as Input? Bridging Post-Reasoning to Chain-of-Thought CompressionChengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Shengchao Liu et al.ACL 2026
- Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning ChainsWenhui Tan, Jiaze Li, Jianzhong Ju, Zhenbo Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 103 citations
- CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-DistillationZhenyi Shen, Hanqi Yan, Linhai Zhang, Zhanghao Hu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Compress the Easy, Explore the Hard: Difficulty-Aware Entropy Regularization for Efficient LLM ReasoningQin-Wen Luo, Sheng Ren, Xiang Chen, Rui Liu et al.KDD 2026 · 4 citations
- Revisiting Chain-of-Thought in Code Generation: Do Language Models Need to Learn Reasoning before Coding?Renbiao Liu, Anqi Li, Chaoding Yang, Hui Sun et al.ICML 2025
