Explicit Planning Helps Language Models in Logical Reasoning
Hongyu Zhao, Kangrui Wang, Mo Yu, Hongyuan Mei
Abstract
Language models have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we propose LEAP, a novel system that uses language models to perform multi-step logical reasoning and incorporates explicit planning into the inference procedure. Explicit planning enables the system to make more informed reasoning decisions at each step by looking ahead into their future effects. Moreover, we propose a training strategy that safeguards the planning process from being led astray by spurious features. Our full system significantly outperforms other competing methods on multiple standard datasets. When using small T5 models as its core selection and deduction components, our system performs competitively compared to GPT-3 despite having only about 1B parameters (i.e., 175 times smaller than GPT-3). When using GPT-3.5, it significantly outperforms chain-of-thought prompting on the challenging PrOntoQA dataset. We have conducted extensive empirical studies to demonstrate that explicit planning plays a crucial role in the system's performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a73d7619-7cc5-46cf-a750-cc349f4580a8Cited by top-tier papers5
- Semantic-Aware Logical Reasoning via a Semiotic FrameworkYunyao Zhang, Xinglang Zhang, Junxi Sheng, Wenbing Li et al.ACL 2026 · 27 citations
- PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Framework for Generating Planning and Reasoning Trajectories for Complex Problem SolvingMihir Parmar, Xin Liu, Palash Goyal, Yanfei Chen et al.EMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- Deep Natural Language Feature Learning for Interpretable PredictionFelipe Urrutia, Cristian Buc Calderon, Valentin BarrièreEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
- Boosting Logical Fallacy Reasoning in LLMs via Logical Structure TreeYuanyuan Lei, Ruihong HuangEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Order Doesn't Matter, But Reasoning Does: Training LLMs with Order-Centric AugmentationQianxi He, Qianyu He, Jiaqing Liang, Weikang Zhou et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence CompositionTushar Khot, Peter Clark, Michal Guerquin, Peter Jansen et al.AAAI 2020 · 387 citations
- Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step ReasoningYao Fu, Hao Peng, Litu Ou, Ashish Sabharwal et al.ICML 2023 · 347 citations
Related papers
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
- Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World ModelShibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Jiahua Hong et al.EMNLP 2023 · 109 citations
- STREET: A Multi-Task Structured Reasoning and Explanation BenchmarkDanilo Neves Ribeiro, Shen Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Henghui Zhu et al.ICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Reasoning Like Program ExecutorsXinyu Pi, Qian Liu, Bei Chen, Morteza Ziyadi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 32 citations
