ReaForest: Fostering Generative Video Reasoning for Spatial Planning
Kun Ouyang, Yuanxin Liu, Xinhao Li, Linli Yao, Xiangyu Zeng, Haoning Wu, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Xu SUN
Abstract
Verbal logic and visual mental simulation are two essential components of human intelligence. Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong verbal reasoning capabilities through textual Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. In contrast, current Video Generation Models (VGMs) struggle with visual reasoning tasks such as spatial planning. We attribute this limitation to two fundamental gaps: (i) VGMs are predominantly trained on general-purpose video corpora emphasizing perceptual fidelity over visual reasoning, leaving reasoning abilities underdeveloped; (ii) most VGMs generate videos in a single pass without mechanisms to explore alternative reasoning trajectories and to revise intermediate errors. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce ReaForest , a framework that fosters the reasoning capacity of VGMs in spatial planning through both training-time activation and inference-time scaling. ReaForest comprises three key components: (1) ReaGen-27k, a dataset covering diverse spatial planning tasks that require multi-step reasoning, which activates basic reasoning capabilities of VGMs for spatial planning; (2) Reflective Entropy-Aware Test-Time Scaling (ReaTTS), an inference framework that evolves multiple reasoning branches while enabling failure recovery; (3) Hierarchical constraint verification, which provides actionable feedback for ReaTTS based on decomposed constraints. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ReaForest substantially surpasses advanced textual reasoning models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-Pro) and video generation models (e.g., Sora-2). ReaForest exhibits emergent properties including self-correction, parallel thinking, and scalable reasoning, advancing VGMs toward human-like visual mental simulation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a72161da-3fd1-4985-8298-bbd09ee0bd7bBuilds on21
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMsKaituo Feng, Kaixiong Gong, Bohao Li, Zonghao Guo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 528 citations
Related papers
- ReaGEN: Adaptive Generation of Structured Chains-of-Thought for Efficient Multimodal ReasoningRuiqing Tian, Mohan Sai Singamsetti, Di Niu, Bahador RashidiCVPR 2026
- VideoReasonBench: Can MLLMs Perform Vision-Centric Complex Video Reasoning?Yuanxin Liu, Kun Ouyang, Haoning Wu, Yi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- ReWatch-R1: Boosting Complex Video Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models through Agentic Data SynthesisCongzhi Zhang, Zhibin Wang, Yinchao Ma, Jiawei Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- A Very Big Video Reasoning SuiteMaijunxian Wang, Ruisi Wang, Juyi Lin, Ran Ji et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
- Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM ReasoningZhenni Bi, Kai Han, Chuanjian Liu, Yehui Tang et al.ICML 2025
